Category: January 2015 – The New SRI Trends Report

Videos & Podcasts

Videos & Podcasts

 

RSF Social Finance

 

 

 

poscast
Episode 45: Live from Silicon Valley, the future of the clean economy This week on the GreenBiz 350 podcast: A glimpse into the future of energy, cities and jobs from VERGE 16 in Santa Clara, California.

 

 

 

 

 

  Planet Blue – Animated 3D Trailer

 

 

 

 

  This is Your Century

 

 

 

 

  Fracking Threatens Chaco’s Sacred American Heritage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Planetary – Reconnect to Something Bigger

 

 

  Fracking Threatens Chaco’s Sacred American Heritage

 

 

  The award-winning DamNation film presented by Patagonia

 

 

 

 

Joan Stokinshow
Joan Stokin host of The Prosperity Show has guest Cliff Feigenbaum of the GreenMoney Journal as her guest on a recent Podcast. Cliff has been involved with sustainable and responsible investing for over 20 years — longer than most people.

 

 

KSFR

Bob Ross, host of Santa Fe Public Radio’s live weekly Farmers Market show, has Cliff Feigenbaum as his guest. Cliff talks to Bob about GreenMoney’s 100th issue and plans for 2015.

[sc_embed_player fileurl=”http://ec.libsyn.com/p/4/8/0/480f76dcfab6e297/GardensFoodSantaFe_12132014.mp3?d13a76d516d9dec20c3d276ce028ed5089ab1ce3dae902ea1d06c98f3fd4ca5b4136&c_id=8050026″]

KSFR PRI Interview with Bob Ross
Cliff Feigenbaum from the Farmers’ Market

 

 

What’s Beyond Organic in Investing?
Don Shaffer, RSF Social Finance; Amy Domini, DSI;
Matt Patsky, Trillium Asset Management

 

 

Increasing Concern Over Climate Change May Be Driving Increase In Sustainable Investing
Lisa Woll interview with Devin Thorpe of Forbes

 

 

Calvert CEO Barbara Krumsiek Talks to Women Entrepreneurs about Corporations, Careers and Choices (Video from TEDxBayArea event)

 

 

Introduction to SRI – Sustainable Responsible Impact Investing
Featuring Steve Schueth, President and Chief Marketing Officer, First Affirmative Financial Network

 

New Initiative Tracks Impact of Shareholder Engagement

Investors and stakeholders present new
reporting framework for impact of equity engagement

 

The multi-stakeholder Impact of Equity Engagement (IE2) initiative released a new Report in mid-November 2014 revealing the positive outcomes of investor engagement on the environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) practices of publicly traded companies.

Investors often engage in the proxy process, dialogue, public policy advocacy, and assertive action with public companies. However, the report found that no standard method exists to date for demonstrating the impact of these activities.

The Report, which proposes a new reporting framework to track the impact of shareholder engagement, is available for download from http://croataninstitute.org/total-portfolio/publication/impact-of-equity-engagement

Eleven investors have already committed to alpha-testing IE2’s reporting framework by using it to track their engagements during the 2015 proxy season: As You Sow, Boston Common Asset Management, Calvert Investments, Clean Yield Asset Management, Green Century Funds, Investor Voice, Newground Social Investment, NorthStar Asset Management, Pax World Management, Trillium Asset Management, and Walden Asset Management.

“We’re excited to test and help further develop this new framework,” said Shelley Alpern, Director of Social Research and Advocacy at Clean Yield Asset Management. “Practitioners of sustainable and responsible investing have known for decades that our engagements with companies have produced hundreds of positive outcomes, but much of it has gone unrecorded. This project will begin to capture the scale and depth of this activity so it is no longer lost to history or inadequately conveyed through mere anecdotes.”

Early findings of the IE2 initiative were presented in November at the SRI Conference by Joshua Humphreys, President and Senior Fellow of Croatan Institute. Humphreys spoke on a panel entitled “Understanding the Impact of Engagement.

[adrotate group=”7″]

“Investors are increasingly interested in generating social and environmental impact in addition to financial returns, but many simply don’t think you can have much impact by investing in publicly traded companies,” said Humphreys. “Our analysis highlights the multiple ways that investors can make a difference by engaging with corporations, and the new reporting framework that the IE2 initiative has developed will provide an important foundation for documenting this impact.”

“Whether it is getting more women and minorities on corporate boards, securing commitments from companies to slash greenhouse gas emissions, or helping to establish human rights and labor standards for entire sectors, we know that our shareholder engagement has an impact,” said Bennett Freeman, Senior Vice President for Sustainability Research and Policy at Calvert Investments.

IE2 builds on an important 2012 study on “Total Portfolio Activation,” which explored how impact can be maximized across all asset classes in an investor’s portfolio.

“We see the importance of understanding and articulating the impact of shareholder advocacy in public equities,” said Matthew Patsky, CEO of Trillium Asset Management. “Public equities is often the largest part of an investment allocation. We need to provide greater clarity in explaining how the impact from this asset class can be so significant.”

Investors using this reporting framework will be able to track and demonstrate the positive social, environmental, and governance impact of their own shareholder activities. By aggregating anonymized data from multiple investors, the reporting framework can also identify what factors lead to successful shareholder engagements.

About Impact of Equity Engagement

Impact of Equity Engagement (IE2) is a multi-stakeholder initiative launched at a convening in Boston in December 2013. IE2 has developed a framework that can inform how the impact of public equity engagement activities are tracked and reported. Initial sponsorship comes from lead sponsors Calvert Investments, Croatan Institute, Tides Foundation, and Trillium Asset Management; and supporting sponsors Boston Common Asset Management, Green Century Capital Management, NorthStar Asset Management, PAX World Investments, and Walden Asset Management. The initiative is coordinated by Croatan Institute. For more information go to- http://croataninstitute.org/ie2

About the Croatan Institute

Croatan Institute, based in Durham, North Carolina, is an independent institute for advanced social and environmental research and engagement. With initial funding from foundations, sustainable investment groups, civil society, and community development organizations, the Institute’s activities address some of the most complex sustainability challenges of our time, often in close partnership with practitioners in the field and movements for social and environmental change. For more information go to- http://croataninstitute.org

Contact:
Joshua Humphreys, President and Senior Fellow, Croatan Institute
Email:  josh@croataninstitute.org
Phone:  919-794-7440 x102

New Report from the Democracy Collaborative Examines How Leading Community Foundations are Embracing an Anchor Mission

“The Innovative 30” are building stronger local economies
and investing more resources in the communities they serve

 

Across the country, forward-thinking community foundations are finding new ways to deploy all their resources to build community wealth. The Democracy Collaborative’s new report, A New Anchor Mission for a New Century, lifts up the work of the “Innovative 30” — community foundations that are leading the way towards this emerging mission.

According to the report’s authors, Democracy Collaborative Senior Fellow Marjorie Kelly and Community Development Associate Violeta Duncan, community foundations are “anchor institutions” — place-based nonprofits with significant resources that are highly unlikely to abandon the communities in which they reside. With many of these communities, in both rural and urban areas, struggling with deeply entrenched economic problems like inequality and unemployment, the case becomes for clear for community foundations to take up the “anchor mission”: recognizing the impact they can have as engines of community economic development and local mission-driven investment. Doing so requires charting an exciting new course beyond the transactional model in which community foundations serve simply as a container for donor-advised funds, to a more transformative model where community foundations take the lead in efforts to revitalize and rebuild more equitable and more sustainable local economies. Such a new mission for community foundations has become especially important as they find their traditional business model threatened more and more by competition from donor-advised funds tied to large commercial banks and investment firms.

Some of the foundations highlighted in the report are concentrating on using their deep knowledge of their communities to kickstart much-needed economic development—launching worker-owned cooperatives, building local business accelerators, and providing key ways to connect resources. Others are rethinking community investment—creating loan pools and guarantees, working with community development financial institutions, and inviting donors to partner on mission-aligned local investments. Some key examples of local philanthropic innovators highlighted by the authors include:

[adrotate group=”7″]

The Cleveland Foundation—the nation’s first community foundation—which convened the Greater University Circle Initiative in 2005. The Initiative brought together large place-based anchor institutions in a comprehensive effort to revitalize the surrounding low-income communities, resulting in a nationally celebrated network of green worker cooperatives, a workforce training center, an employer-assisted housing program, and a robust community engagement initiative.

The Incourage Community Foundation in Wisconsin, which has made a bold commitment in 2014 to reexamine all of its operations with a mission lens. The Foundation’s ambitious goal is to orient 100% of its investments—as well as its grantmaking, purchasing, and hiring— towards building a stronger and more inclusive local economy.

The Vermont Community Foundation, which combines 5% of all funds, including donor-advised funds, into a local investment pool, and then builds on these investments with grantmaking and convening aimed at developing a healthier, more inclusive, and more economically robust food system statewide.

The importance of such transformative innovations is underscored by many of the field builders and leaders interviewed for the report. Sandy Wiggins, working with the Business Alliance for Local Living Economies (BALLE) and RSF Social Finance to convene a Community Foundation Circle to share best practices in local impact investing, notes that community foundations can serve “as the nexus for a whole ecosystem of community capital to support local economic development.” Clara Miller of the Heron Foundation concurs, seeing a key role for community foundations as leaders in “economic reinvention” designed “to promote a more inclusive, just and productive society.”

As the need for creative solutions to deep and serious problems grows more pressing, Kelly and Duncan in their report underscore the importance of lifting up the work of innovative community foundations which are “beginning to adopt a new anchor mission: a commitment to fully deploy all resources—financial, social, intellectual, human–to build community wealth.”

About A New Anchor Mission for a New Century

About The Democracy Collaborative:

The Democracy Collaborative is a national non-profit research and consulting institution dedicated to developing new ways to build community wealth and stronger local economies. The Collaborative has assisted a number of community foundations with their community wealth building activities. For more information, visit:  http://democracycollaborative.org

Contact:
John Duda, Communications Coordinator, The Democracy Collaborative
Email:  jduda@democracycollaborative.org
Phone:  (202) 559-1473 x102
Twitter: @democracycollab

 

Corporate Human Rights Benchmark

The first wide-scale business and human rights
benchmarking and ranking project

 

In early December 2014, a group of investors, an NGO, a think tank and an investor research agency, today announce the launch of the first wide-scale project to rank companies on their human rights performance. A total of 500 of the top global companies from four key sectors – Agriculture, ICT, Apparel, and Extractives – will initially be researched and ranked.

The Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (CHRB) will harness the competitive nature of the markets to drive better human rights performance, namely through developing a transparent, publicly available and credible benchmark.

Investors, companies, governments and consumers are increasingly aware of the impacts of business on human rights. Two years after the Tazreen factory fire and one year after Rana Plaza, the Bangladesh Accord has driven industry transparency, publicly reporting on factory inspections; this year, Coca-Cola and Pepsi committed to zero tolerance policies on land grabs; the EU is soon to restrict exports on spyware surveillance technologies due to human rights concerns; and US conflict mineral legislation has led to a 65 percent drop in armed groups’ profits from the trade.

Public transparency, combined with public rankings of companies’ performance, is proving a powerful tool in driving a ‘race to the top’. The Access to Medicine Index has brought advances in the pharmaceutical industry’s approach to providing and pricing medicines for poor people suffering from diseases from HIV/AIDS to tuberculosis. Oxfam’s Behind the

Brands has created competition between 10 food and beverage giants to eliminate land grabs, enhance the status of women in their supply chains, and reduce carbon emissions.

[adrotate group=”7″]

Steve Waygood of Aviva Investors said: “Our Benchmark will introduce a positive competitive environment as companies try to race to the top of the annual ranking. It will also shine a light on those where performance needs to improve. It took more than 60 years from the signing of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights before the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights were developed. We believe that within six years of their approval, we can help to make these Guiding Principles routine corporate practice through the development and use of the Benchmark.”

Phil Bloomer of Business and Human Rights Resource Centre said: “Our ranking will reward good practice by companies, and create a major incentive for poor performers to improve rapidly. The ranking will be a tool for campaigners, trade unions, investors and governments to encourage and press companies to deliver respect, dignity and essential freedoms to their workers, neighboring communities, and the societies in which they

“The process of benchmarking and then ranking companies on their commitment and performance will reinforce the inescapable proposition that companies in all industries must respect human rights,” said Bennett Freeman of Calvert Investments. “Moreover, as investors become increasingly aware of human rights-related risk across sectors and asset classes, this framework will be a critical due diligence tool for evaluating how companies are managing those risks” Freeman said.

Peter Webster of EIRIS said: “We are delighted to make our long-standing experience of creating ratings, and the criteria on which they are built, available to this project. Our clients and other responsible investors are raising a growing number of human rights issues with companies, and by taking data out from behind a pay wall this project has the potential for

John Morrison of the Institute for Human Rights and Business said: “The Corporate Human Rights Benchmark will be the first publicly available ranking of corporate policies, processes and performance on human rights. It will seek to assess the reality behind companies’ public commitments, including what they do to address negative impacts when things go wrong, and what kinds of collaborations they undertake to scale their resources.”

Giuseppe van der Helm of VBDO said: “As a sustainable investment forum, VBDO has 20 years’ experience with measuring company CSR performance in benchmarks. In our company engagements, we have noticed that public benchmarks make sustainability topics more concrete for companies and create a ‘race to the top’. We expect the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark to do the same.”

Over the next three years the six organizations, making up the CHRB Steering Group, will conduct a worldwide consultation on the methodology and results with diverse stakeholders, and incrementally collect and release information on 500 companies’ human rights performance. Powerful information will be made available through an open source, online portal to empower the range of business and human rights advocates among companies, investors, governments, local communities and NGOs.

When achieved, this will be an extraordinary breakthrough moment for the business and human rights field, creating greater corporate accountability, incentivising and requiring changes in business behavior and creating greater leverage for policy-makers, investors, communities and consumers.

Amol Mehra of the Corporate Accountability Roundtable (ICAR), a coalition of human rights, environmental, labor, and development organizations who welcomed CHRB’s launch, said: “By building a comparative assessment of company performance on human rights, the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark initiative creates useful and needed momentum for corporate respect for human rights, and ultimately accountability.”

The Benchmark portal will be housed on the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre website at:

http://business-humanrights.org/en/corporate-human-rights-benchmark

About the Partners:

Aviva Investors is a global asset management business dedicated to building and providing client focused solution and part of Aviva plc, one of the UK’s largest insurance services providers.

Business and Human Rights Resource Centre is an international NGO that tracks the human rights impacts (positive & negative) of over 5600 companies in over 180 countries making information available on its seven language website.

Calvert Investments is an investment management firm and leader in sustainable and responsible investment strategies.

EIRIS is a global leader in the provision of environmental, social, governance (ESG) research for responsible investors.

The Institute for Human Rights and Business is a global “think and do” tank that provides a trusted, impartial space for dialogue and independent analysis to deepen understanding of human rights challenges and the appropriate role of business.

VBDO is the Dutch association of investors for sustainable development that aims at a sustainable capital market, considering financial as well as non-financial ESG criteria.

Contact:
Stephen Hine, Head of Responsible Investment Development, EIRIS
Email-  stephen.hine@eiris.org
T: +44(0)2078405716 or M: +44(0)7725594533

 

Slow Money 2014–Where Relationship Investing Has Taken Root

By Michelle Mosser,
BrandNature.net and Grace Communications

 

Michelle MosserDuring the unseasonable arctic freeze that swept across America in November, the Slow Money Alliance convened their largest US gathering to date where a groundswell of relationship-hungry investors, local food activists and a new breed of farmers gathered to advance a common cause: The restoration of healthy, local food systems; nutrient- and carbon-rich soil; and small-scale, ethical, sustainable farming enterprises.

Since the publishing of Woody Tasch’s paradigm-shifting book of the same name–Slow Money–the organization he founded, has been a beacon for people who see a connection between “too-big-to-fail” investment practices and the growing list of casualties resulting from the mega-industrial take over of our food systems.

Since 2009, Woody and team have strategically seeded the annual gathering in different US communities where solutions to local food crises are well underway. This year they rolled into Louisville, a city that is no stranger to economic and social divides, nor the loss of surrounding farmland.

At the first Town-Hall style conversation, conference attendees from over 46 states shared a political lens with three progressive community leaders, while gaining insight into the economic and cultural revival underway in this part of Kentucky. Pioneer land activist, renowned author and lifelong Henry County farmer Wendell Berry profoundly shaped the character of this panel. Louisville Mayor Greg Fischer has welcomed Berry’s wisdom and input from other farm advocates, and spoke about the health, jobs and tourism benefits of scaling up the local food economy. Relaying the macro picture from Washington, DC, Congresswoman Chellie Pingree (D, Maine), once an organic farmer herself, spoke candidly about the corporate power of “Big Ag.” In contrast, she sited advances within the Local Farms, Food and Jobs Act.  Known before as Food Stamps, 85% of the reformed Farm Bill’s resources now go to SNAP program benefits, which earn double their value when redeemed at farmers’ markets, making it easier for low-income families to buy healthier food.

[adrotate group=”7″]

Louisville Mayor Greg Fischer recounted, “As a mayor, I see a food system as a metaphor for what we see on a larger basis happening in our country. As we see a massive amount of inequality and accumulation of wealth with a very small percentage of people, for me, it’s a metaphor for what’s happening to our land right now. Things are happening faster to it then we can understand, or want to perhaps, in long-term consequences, for the benefit of a few mass producers to make more money over the benefit of hundreds of thousands of small and mid-size farmers who are tilling the land in a sustainable way. It’s the same as what’s happening with the erosion of middle-income workers. We get caught in the vortex of speed that’s happening in the world now and it’s difficult to step back and look at what’s happening with our food, education and our country. There’s the unintended cost of bad food to health, such as obesity and childhood diabetes. In Louisville, we have to unlearn some things. So we’re starting a compassionate education program in our schools, from kindergarten up, modeling coping skills, mindfulness and healthy eating, because we know 67% of our children are on free and reduced cost lunch programs and are raised around violence and lack of nutrition.”

Wendell Berry portrayed, “The understanding is that the toxicity and destruction, erosive-ness of industrial agriculture is directly related to the destruction of rural communities. Big machines, continuous tillage, and continuous application and larger amounts of toxic chemicals have replaced the people who used to be there.”  

Slow Money’s focus this year was to engage people in conversations, connecting the impressive list of presenters who donated their time, the 21 selected Showcase Entrepreneurs and the more than 800 attendees. And there was no shortage of pressing topics to talk about. Three Town Hall panels were designed to share initiatives gaining the most traction, while focusing on key obstacles to success.

Gary Nahban, MacArthur Fellow and Slow Money Board Member, framed the state of soil this way: “Within the next two decades more than half of all of America’s farm and ranch land will be transferred. Four hundred million acres of food producing lands are at risk of going out of food production, much of that near our cities where an incredible array of micro businesses, food artisans and healthy food suppliers need that food in order to deliver their products to people.”

Carbon-Building, Multi-Generational Food Systems

Patrick Holden, founding director of the London-based Sustainable Food Trust, shared their efforts toward redesigning the food system from the ground up. Implementing “true cost accounting” would level the playing field for small farmers by factoring government food subsidies, healthcare ramifications, industrial agriculture impacts to land and water, and the taxation of nitrogen soil damage.

A new breed of sustainable farm leaders are pointing to a somewhat different set of skills than 20th century farmers might have imagined. Hard work, hand-shake integrity and a passion for the land still run deep, but now we hear about farming models which are far less capital intensive and far more biodiverse. Joel Salatin, third generation farmer, author and popular speaker shared his benchmarks for success: Where essential farm equity is demonstrated as applied knowledge; small-scale mobile innovation; resource fluidity; child friendly; animal honoring; and customer relations centric. Long term success is measured as much in carbon-building soil and growth of the commons, as it is in yields and job creation. He states, “The average farm in America has four dollars of infrastructure to generate one dollar in sales. On our farm we have fifty-cents of infrastructure to generate one dollar…that’s an 800% difference!” His family farm services 3,000 families, 50 restaurants, 10 retail outlets, metro buying clubs and hosts online sales and on-site tours.

Food and Culture are Synonymous

A growing number of cities, have recognized the economic value of promoting local food and flavors that are unique to their region through gastronomy specialties at area restaurants, markets and farm tours. Restoring nutrient-rich farmland and pollinator corridors, while valuing the cultural heritage stories of family farms are increasingly seen as natural assets to place-authentic tourism. Louisville has launched Bourbonism, defined as the act of visiting Kentucky to enjoy local food and the region’s notable bourbons.

Food Investing – First State of the Sector Report

Over half of attendees registered as investors, with 100+ indicating their affiliation as professional advisors, angels or foundation managers. Approximately 350 self-identified as emerging investors, who wanted to align their values with their money.

During lobby interludes, it was evident how true these numbers played out. Enthusiastic dialogues flowed, with many career women indicating they’d recently pulled their savings out of conventional “Wall Street” investments. Many shared that it was their first Slow Money conference where they came to learn more about how to invest in sustainable farming and healthy food enterprises.

Lisa Dettlinger, founder of C-SAW Collaborative in Louisville remarked that being introduced to Slow Money was coming at the perfect time. After working with neighborhoods across the city on issues of civic engagement, environmental and economic rights, she’s launching her non-profit with the vision of bringing people together around food, especially those from the refugee and immigrant neighborhoods. Along with an urban farm, her organization is re-opening the landmark Hay Market that closed years back. “This conference gave me a big dose of confidence, practical tools and opened the door to new funding options. I’ve already setup meetings with two of the Showcase entrepreneurs who have established farms in their cities and met folks starting an investor group here.”

Katherine Kelly, Executive Director of CULTIVATE Kansas City said she’s followed Slow Money since it’s inception. She’s a veteran of the locally-grown food movement with almost 20 years of experience as a farmer and educator. Her organization is one of the oldest urban food NGOs in the country. They’ve developed a systems model with two working farms, a CSA, farmer training programs in organics, management and for the city’s refugee communities. And they now run a low-income, matching-incentives food buying program. “The Slow Money model of financing, that is more relationship based, will be much easier for farmers to engage in, than going to banks or dealing with big governmental departments. This is the exact right time for our city to have the same kinds of conversations that Slow Money is hosting. We’re at a place where we can put these ideas to work.”

Slow Money issued their First State of the Sector Report, which captured early trends from 2009 to 2013. Thirty-one million dollars flowed through their networks to more than 350 small food enterprises, primarily in the US. Survey respondents included 32 investment funds, family offices and foundations. Report findings combined with Slow Money’s investment database tracked $293 million invested in more than 968 transactions during the same time period. Of note, 36% of investments went to farm or ranchland projects; 34% to organic brands; 9% to both farm operations and aggregation/distribution channels; and 8% to food processing. Sixty percent of investors surveyed prioritized local food production, job creation, rural economic vitality and increased access to healthy foods for all Americans.

“BEETCOIN” Crowdfunding Raised $100,000 for Three Showcase Winners

Slow Money launched BEETCOIN, their first crowd funding campaign in September with the goal of awarding raised funds to top voted Entrepreneurial Showcase winners at their November Gathering. The campaign earned $75,032 from 373 donors. Slow Money topped off the effort to achieve an even $100,000.

Advancing a core tenant of their mission, this year’s Showcase competition fielded over 100 applications from local food, farm and land conserving operations vying for the opportunity to present to investors at the event. Twenty-one applicants were selected from across the country and four supply chain sectors. An impressive range of whole systems, solutions-based models that have been ground-tested and envisioned to tackle some of America’s toughest food system problems were presented.

Four of those have established urban farm programs targeting food desert crises in their home cities, including Boston, Cincinnati and Chicago. The Root Cellar in Columbia, Missouri addressed the lesser-known plight of rural food deserts, where mono and industrial scale agriculture has all but wiped out local sources of fresh, seasonal food in many small communities.

Second place BEETCOIN finalist, Louisville’s New Roots, was awarded $20,000 for its impact connecting 35 minority farmers with income-challenged, food desert neighborhoods. Over 650 families now have access to affordable, healthy food. Their shareholder commitment enables the farmers to plan seed purchases and growing-season expenses.

Sustainable Iowa Land Trust, (SILT) tied for Second place and was also awarded $20,000. Their non-profit has a comprehensive plan to purchase and receive prime endowment farmland to lease in perpetuity to emerging farmers. Advocates sight the lack of ability to purchase land as a key obstacle for young people who want to farm. Joel Salatin asserted the obvious, “When young people can’t get in to an economic sector, the old people can’t get out!”

Inside the 2014 Slow Money Conference

The First place award of $60,000 went to Bauman Cedar Valley Farms, in Garnett, Kansas – a four-generation family farm that raises pastured poultry, meat and dairy cows and grows GMO-free grains. Funding will enable them to build a grainery to serve area small farmers, so they can once again, purchase non-GMO grains in their own back yard.

For more information on the Slow Money organization, Local Groups and BEETCOIN go to- www.slowmoney.org

Article by Michelle Mosser, BrandNature.net and Grace Communications

Major SRI Drivers and Emerging Trends

From the US SIF

 

Major SRI Drivers and Emerging Trends In recent years, numerous trends have shaped the evolution and growth of SRI within US financial markets:

Money managers increasingly are incorporating ESG factors into their investment analysis and portfolio construction, driven by the demand for ESG investing products from institutional and individual investors and by the mission and values of their management firms. Of the managers that responded to an information request about reasons for incorporating ESG, the highest percentage, 80 percent, cited client demand as their motivation.

The growth of the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) and the first annual publication of the PRI’s Responsible Investment Transparency Reports in summer 2014 has led to new data about money managers that engage in ESG integration (or “general” environmental, social and governance considerations) across multiple asset classes. The increasing popularity of SRI has led major money managers including Capital Group and Wellington Asset Management to expand the application of ESG factors to wider portions of their portfolios.

Of the money managers that responded to an information request about their ESG incorporation strategies, more than half reported that they use negative screening within their funds. Others reported using strategies of positive screening, impact investing and sustainability-themed investing. Yet the incorporation strategy that affected the highest number of assets, $4.74 trillion, was ESG integration. (See the glossary of ESG incorporation terms below.)

Following the December 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School and growing pressure from elected officials and stakeholders, institutional investors and money managers alike have incorporated investment criteria related to military and weapons production. In the past two years, consideration of these criteria by money managers has grown nearly four-fold in asset-adjusted terms, incorporated by 292 investment vehicles representing $588 billion in assets. Among institutional asset owners, concerns over military and weapons production now apply to $355.1 billion in assets, a nearly five-fold increase.

For both money managers and institutional investors, climate change remains the most significant environmental factor in terms of assets, affecting $275.6 billion and $551.5 billion, respectively. Fossil fuel restriction or divestment policies, tracked for the first time in 2014, accounted for $29.4 billion in money manager assets and $13.5 billion in institutional investor assets at the beginning of 2014. Additionally, in the past year, momentum around fossil-free investment has continued to grow in ways that this report’s snapshot of the field at the beginning of 2014 does not fully reflect. Moreover, shareholders concerned about climate risk filed 72 resolutions on the subject in 2014, more than double the number in 2012, and negotiated a number of commitments from the target companies to disclose and reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.

Place-based investing, largely by public funds directing investment into their city or state in targeted strategies, emerged as a new trend, accounting for nearly $90 billion in assets.

The number and proportion of shareholder proposals on social and environmental issues that receive high levels of support has been trending upward.

In response to shareholder campaigns for better corporate governance practices, the number of US companies establishing more stringent standards for their board elections continues to grow. These companies are requiring directors to submit to annual elections and to offer their resignations if they fail to receive approval from the majority of shares voted.

Individual and institutional investors have given overwhelming support to a rulemaking petition urging the US Securities and Exchange Commission to require companies to disclose their political spending. The SEC had received more than 1 million comments on the proposal—a record in SEC rulemaking history.

 

[adrotate group=”7″]

ESG Incorporation Strategies and Terms

Negative/Exclusionary:  the exclusion from a fund or plan of certain sectors or companies based on specific ESG criteria

ESG Integration:  the systematic and explicit inclusion by investment managers of ESG risks and opportunities into traditional financial analysis

Positive/Best-in-Class:  investment in sectors, companies or projects selected for positive ESG performance relative to industry peers

Impact Investing:  targeted investments, typically made in private markets, aimed at solving social or environmental problems

Sustainability Themed Investing:  the selection of assets specifically related to sustainability in single- or multi-themed funds

  • 1
  • 2
Signup to receive GreenMoney's monthly eJournal

Privacy Policy
Copyright © GreenMoney Journal 2024

Website design & development by BrandNature

Global Events Calendar

View All Events

december

03decAll Day04The Scope 3 Innovation Forum USA - Wash, DC area

03decAll Day04Responsible Investor USA 2024 - NYC

X