Category: September 2015 – Impact Investing Picks Up Speed

Sustainability Disclosures – Is Your Company Meeting Investor Expectations?

From PwC’s Sustainable Business Solutions practice

Demand for Sustainability Disclosures Continues to Rise

Customers, investors, and other stakeholders are increasingly demanding more transparency from companies on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors and other non-financial risks. As a result, there has been an increase in the number of companies voluntarily providing this information. However, while 75 percent of companies in the S&P 500 published sustainability reports in 2014 [1], investors have expressed a high level of dissatisfaction with the sustainability-related information being provided [2].

Investor Dissatisfaction with Sustainability-Related Information

82% of investors are dissatisfied with how risks and opportunities are identified and quantified in financial terms

79% of investors are dissatisfied with the comparability of sustainability reporting between companies in the same industry

74% of investors are dissatisfied with the relevance and implication of sustainability risk

69% of investors are dissatisfied with how companies identify social and environmental impacts in its supply chain.

Enhancing Sustainability Disclosure

A number of organizations have provided frameworks for sustainability reporting. The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) is a relatively new organization, with a focus on investor information needs. The SASB is a U.S.-based, independent non-profit organization whose goal is to develop and disseminate industry based guidance to help companies disclose decision-useful information to stakeholders. SASB standards are designed for the voluntary disclosure of material sustainability information and metrics in SEC filings, such as Form 10-K. As such, companies may use SASB standards as part of their existing disclosure controls and procedures when evaluating known trends and uncertainties. Alternatively, a company might consider the SASB guidance when providing voluntary disclosure in sustainability reports or other disclosure vehicles. Beyond disclosure, SASB standards might also help companies identify potential enhancements to corporate strategy and supporting initiatives (e.g., increasing the use of environmentally preferred materials).

What You Need to Know

The majority of investors we surveyed who use sustainability-related information in investment decisions are dissatisfied with the information available.

In the U.S., the SASB is responding to investor demand by developing disclosure guidance and metrics on an industry basis.

More than 2,300 people, including investors with an aggregate of more than $23T in assets under management, have participated in SASB’s industry working groups.

The SASB has issued standards for 45 industries in 6 sectors to date, and expects to have standards for more than 80 industries in 10 sectors available by 2016.

Possible Actions Companies Can Take Now

If the SASB has published an industry standard relevant to your company, we recommend considering the following approach:

1 – Understand whether the topics are relevant for disclosure
— Will the item impact the business in the short, medium or long-term?

— Could the impact become material to the business now or in the future, considering both likelihood and magnitude?

2 – Assess the current state of disclosure and management of the topics
— Review current disclosures and underlying processes for completeness, accuracy, and decision usefulness

— Evaluate current knowledge and management of each disclosure topic to identify gaps in strategy (e.g., does a topic relate to current business strategy and your ability to deliver shareholder value?)

What to Keep in Mind

Investors are not the only audience for sustainability disclosures — your customers, employees, suppliers and others are important stakeholders.

Your company’s risk exposure may rise, as third-parties, including investors and other stakeholders, increasingly rely on sustainability disclosures to make economic decisions.

SASB standards are voluntary, so you may decide not to provide sustainability disclosures, but your company may gain other benefits from using the standards (e.g., improve focus on sustainability issues that are most important to long-term value creation).

Reference Notes

[1]  Governance & Accountability Institute, June 10, 2015

[2]  PwC, Sustainability goes mainstream: Insights into investor views

For more information visit-

http://www.pwc.com/us/en/cfodirect/publications/in-the-loop/sustainability-disclosure-guidance-sasb.jhtml

Source: PWC

Leading Impact Investing, SRI Experts Join The SRI Conference 2015 Line-Up

Largest Annual Meeting of SRI Professionals Confirms 3 New Major Speakers; Rise of Impact Investing to be Focus of The 26th Annual SRI Conference-Agenda Now Available Online.

Leading experts on impact investing will be featured at The SRI Conference (www.SRIConference.com) on November 3-5, 2015 at the Broadmoor Hotel in Colorado Springs, CO. Among the major speakers and presenters will be top experts from the Paulson Institute, Domini Social Investments, and Bloomberg.

Titled “All In For Impact,” The SRI Conference 2015 will be a major magnet for investment industry professionals and those in the philanthropy and foundation worlds.
Among the major speakers will be:

Kate Gordon, vice chair for Climate and Sustainable Urbanization, Paulson Institute. Ms. Gordon provides overall strategy and coordination for the Institute’s climate change, air quality, and sustainable urbanization programs both in the U.S. and China. She is senior fellow at the Center for American Progress and a regular contributor to The Wall Street Journal as one of the paper’s “Energy Experts.” At The SRI Conference, Gordon will participate in a panel focusing on climate change “winners and losers.”

Amy L. Domini, founder and CEO, Domini Social Investments. Domini Social Investments offers the Domini Social Equity Fund, the Domini International Social Equity Fund, and the Domini Social Bond Fund. In 2005, Ms. Domini was named by Time magazine as one of the world’s 100 most influential people. She was honored at the inaugural meeting of the Clinton Global Initiative for helping protect children and the environment through the Domini Global Giving Fund. At The SRI Conference, Domini will be recognized as a SRI Pioneer and deliver remarks referencing her history of industry leadership and outlining important new developments.

Curtis Ravenel, global head, Sustainable Business & Finance, Bloomberg L.P. As Global Head of Sustainable Business & Finance, Curtis Ravenel leads Bloomberg’s sustainability initiative, a Chairman’s Office effort. The program aggressively integrates sustainability considerations into all firm operations and leverages the Bloomberg Professional Service to evaluate sustainability-related investment risks and opportunities for its 315,000 customers. Previously at Bloomberg, Mr. Ravenel was the Financial Controller for Asia, preceded by roles in the Capital Planning and Financial Analysis Groups. He serves as an advisor to the Global Initiative for Sustainability Ratings (GISR) and the USA Advisory Board to the G8 Social Impact Investment Taskforce. He serves on the board of the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB).

First Affirmative Financial Network President, Steve Schueth, said: “In 2015, The SRI Conference will put investing for impact in the spotlight, with insights and discussion from many of the industry’s leading experts. We will be exploring a multitude of investment strategies that can help any investor go ‘All In For Impact.’ We are excited to announce the official agenda for The SRI Conference today, and to highlight the confirmation of three new top-level speakers, who will have a broad appeal to responsible investors of all sizes and motivations.”

ABOUT THE SRI CONFERENCE
The SRI Conference is the premier annual forum for investors and investment professionals engaged in sustainable, responsible, impact (SRI) investing. The 2015 conference will also appeal to philanthropic institutions and foundations eager to learn more about investing for impact. The elevated national attention on impact has produced a record number of proposals for speakers, presentations, and panel discussions for the 2015 conference agenda. For updates on the conference agenda, visit http://www.sriconference.com/agenda/2015-conference-agenda.html

The SRI Conference – on Sustainable, Responsible, Impact Investing (http://www.SRIConference.com) is produced by First Affirmative Financial Network, LLC (http://www.firstaffirmative.com), an independent Registered Investment Advisor (SEC File #801-56587) offering investment consulting and asset management services through a nationwide network of investment professionals who specialize in serving socially conscious, impact-oriented investors.

IN Place and Impact Network Santa Fe: Place-Sourced Impact Investing

By Nicholas Mang and David Breecker of IN Santa Fe and IN Place

The greater Santa Fe region, like most communities today, faces a growing need to develop a healthy and resilient economy, address social inequality and achieve environmental sustainability — needs that have been exacerbated by recession-driven constraints on public and philanthropic funds. The concept of impact investment — affirmative investment strategies aimed at growing social and environmental as well as financial capital — holds great potential for addressing many of these funding challenges. Until recently, much of the focus in this field has been at the national and global level, and not specifically on developing comprehensive local community strategies and infrastructure for impact investment. But that focus is shifting as interest in, and the need for, local economic development strategies grows.

This increased interest in local economic development models is producing an outpouring of new initiatives, programs, literature and techniques around the country. The number of local investment funds has grown in Santa Fe, and enthusiasm about the promise of impact investment is growing. At the same time, however, those involved locally report a number of challenges that are potentially limiting the effectiveness and growth of programs and inhibiting the possible entry of important new players. These challenges, which may be common to many communities, include:

On the demand side: a need for developing more, and more viable local social enterprises that can be invested into, as well as building entrepreneurial capacity to successfully drive them.

On the supply side: a need for greater education and capacity building among potential investors to support wise and measured investments that create early successes, develop a base of knowledge and experience, and build investors’ confidence.

Connective capacity: an overall need for greater infrastructural and shared capacity, to leverage resources and increase connectivity between demand and supply side entities, and all other stakeholders. This could include the development of information sharing networks, local social enterprise networks, policy and regulatory innovations, shared metric systems, new investment pooling vehicles, investment intermediaries, etc.

The IN Santa Fe Experiment

Building upon the unique qualities inherent in north-central New Mexico, in 2012 the Impact Network Santa Fe (IN Santa Fe) initiative was launched by Regenesis Group, the Story of Place Institute, the Santa Fe Innovation Park and a pair of local funders. Their intent was to foster the emergence of an impact investing ecosystem for growing diversified “community wealth” in the region. As the project’s co-directors, we define community wealth through a “five capitals” lens, in which five forms of capital (financial, human, social, built, and ecological) are grown simultaneously from each investment, without any capital being diminished over the long-term. Through a collaborative process, a set of metrics is being developed to assess community-scale impact across the multiple capitals.

IN Santa Fe’s cross-sector, systemic approach was developed through a series of dialogues involving the public, private and philanthropic sectors. The participants offered a number of local impact investment ideas. An organizing team was then formed to identify governing principles and next steps forward. Their intent was to establish a network of partners who could foster development of a vibrant community ecosystem for local impact investing that could leverage social, environmental and economic benefits. Besides building a network of potential social investors who are interested in companies that do social good as well as providing shareholder value, IN Santa Fe is helping launch business startups that engage local values and resources.

“Social entrepreneurship encompasses ideas from triple-bottom-line businesses to nonprofits, from environmentally conscious products to new sustainable methods of production,” said Sean O’Shea, program director at the Santa Fe Business Incubator and co-organizer of Santa Fe Startup Weekend. Startup Weekend is a nonprofit global network where, for 54-hours, developers, designers, marketers, product managers and startup enthusiasts come together to share ideas, form teams and build products. In September 2014, IN Santa Fe partnered with Santa Fe Startup Weekend to offer a social enterprise component to the intensive entrepreneurial brainstorming.

The INSF Social Entrepreneur Fellowship

Also in 2014-2015, IN Santa Fe prototyped an intensive “Challenge” Fellowship program that provided opportunities for visionary entrepreneurs from all areas of the social venture spectrum to seed their projects, learn, grow and develop their enterprises into investor-worthy businesses. Chosen by a panel of judges through a competitive challenge, the selected entrepreneurs worked with a team of topical experts and resource networks to develop integrated business plans that can increase the systemic impact of their startup ventures. Beyond the five-month “challenge” period, IN Santa Fe provides ongoing networking, resource support and promotional assistance.

The first generation of IN Santa Fe’s Fellowship projects:

Awesome Harvest – An innovative Santa Fe-based manufacturing company that makes recyclable, biodegradable pots for transplanting and growing plants. The pots are currently available at Costco and other retailers.

Comida de Campos – An Embudo, NM family farm, seeking to keep local farming sustainable and alive as a family tradition, is launching an innovative, farm-to-vending machine venture that delivers fresh, healthy food products directly to work places.

Tall Foods – A new startup company that seeks to bolster sustainable ranching through farming and marketing of tasty tall foods (aka ostrich).

Wildfire Network – A nonprofit startup that is developing an innovative social entrepreneurial model for developing capacity to address the Southwest’s looming wildfire mitigation and forest resiliency hazards.

An open web platform to support ongoing development of innovation capacity and other relevant projects, events, information and resources is also being developed, with the support of the Santa Fe Community Foundation.

The IN Place Expansion

We intend to make IN Santa Fe’s process and infrastructure available to other regions that may want to adopt this place-sourced impact investing model, throughout New Mexico and beyond, under the umbrella of an overall initiative called IN Place. Several communities are now under consideration as “Beta sites” for next year.

For more information on IN Place or IN Santa Fe, email info@sfimpact.org  or visit www.sfimpact.org

Author Biographies:

David Breecker serves as Co-Director of IN Santa Fe and IN Place, Managing Director of the Microgrid Systems Laboratory, President of the Santa Fe Innovation Park, a creative solutions laboratory, and Principle Consultant at David Breecker Associates, specializing in strategies for business, industry, and economic development. He earned his MBA from Harvard in 1982, and has acquired over 30 years of general management experience.

David was the principle author and architect of the New Mexico Media Industries Strategy Project for Governor Bill Richardson’s office, and the Santa Fe regional TREE plan for renewable energy and sustainability technology-based development; and prepared Santa Fe County’s long-term economic development plan in 2014. He has been a musician, feature film production executive, and writer.

Nicholas Mang serves as Co-Director of IN Santa Fe and IN Place, Co-Executive Director of the Story of Place Institute, and is a Principal at Regenesis Group. His work focuses on developing systemic frameworks for engaging citizens with place, and developing and implementing stakeholder engagement strategies that develop a healthy and viable relationship between human and natural communities over time.

Through Regenesis, an interdisciplinary design team, Nicholas has worked on a range of projects across the the United States and Latin America. Through the Story of Place Institute, a nonprofit he co-founded in 2009 to bring regenerative development work to community and neighborhood-level planning processes, much of Nicholas’s work has focused on Santa Fe and the Northern New Mexico area. Nicholas holds a PhD from Saybrook University.

Calvert Expands Responsible Indexes and Launches New Funds

Calvert Investments, Inc., a global leader in Responsible Investing, announced in late June 2015 a major new initiative that the firm describes as the next step in the evolution of responsible investing. The firm is building upon its global Responsible Investing research expertise and has launched a suite of Responsible Indexes and related lower cost Index Funds that will track them.

HIGHLIGHTS

Three distinct U.S. large cap indexes have been created based on style: Calvert U.S. Large Cap Growth Responsible Index, Calvert U.S. Large Cap Core Responsible Index, Calvert U.S. Large Cap Value Responsible Index

The existing Calvert Social Index Fund has become the Calvert U.S. Large Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (NASDAQ: CSXAX). Calvert is also launching two additional index funds, the Calvert U.S. Large Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (NASDAQ: CGJAX) and the Calvert U.S. Large Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (NASDAQ: CFJAX), each based on one of the new indexes. The Funds are all now available to the public.

Additional Responsible Indexes and Funds providing coverage of other significant portions of the global equity markets are anticipated later this year, including U.S. mid cap, non-U.S. developed markets and emerging markets.

Calvert’s indexes and investment products are evolving to meet both the growing interest in responsible investing and the increasing demand for lower-cost options. Said John Streur, CEO, Calvert Investments, “Investors want to access companies that are global leaders in ESG and that are capable of producing competitive returns. An index strategy provides a truly cost efficient way to do that.”

“Calvert Investments has over 30 years of leadership in defining the environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors in the investment context. Combine this with its shareholder engagement and there is no better firm to drive positive change for investors. Calvert is committed to meeting the evolving needs of our institutional and private clients with innovative products that improve on the characteristics of Responsible Investing and passive investing.”

The new index suite reflects the continued evolution of Calvert s research system and the increasing availability of non-financial data. “Calvert’s process analyzes, scores and ranks every company on material ESG risk and opportunity across all 156 GICS sub-sectors,” said Erica Lasdon, Director, Sustainability Research. “This approach focuses on those ESG factors that are most material in each sector or industry. The way we apply proprietary technology allows us to take a leap forward,” she said.

Calvert has partnered with indexing leader S-Network Global Indexes, Inc. (SNGI) to manage the benchmark universes. Calvert Responsible Index Portfolio Manager Laurie Webster, CFA, said, “S-Net specializes in sustainable and impact investing. The firm has developed several important Impact indexes, including the S-Network Global Water Index and the Ardour Global Alternative Energy Indexes – both of which Calvert uses in long-standing investment products.”

Information about the Calvert Responsible Index Series as well as Calvert s Principles of Responsible Investing can be found on www.Calvert.com

 

About Calvert Investments
Calvert Investments is a global leader in Responsible Investing. Our mission is to deliver superior long-term performance to our clients and enable them to achieve positive impact. Founded in 1976 and headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, Calvert Investments had more than $13 billion in assets under management as of May 31, 2015. Learn more at www.Calvert.com

About S-Network
S-Network is a service mark of S-Network Global Indexes, Inc. and has been licensed for use by Calvert Investments. The Calvert Responsible Index Funds are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by S-Network Global Indexes, Inc. and S-Network Global Indexes, Inc. makes no representation regarding the advisability of investing in any such Fund.

For more information on any Calvert Fund, please contact Calvert at 800.368.2748 for a free summary prospectus and/or prospectus. An investor should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of an investment carefully before investing. The summary prospectus and prospectus contain this and other information. Read them carefully before you invest or send money.

Calvert mutual funds are underwritten and distributed by Calvert Investment Distributors, Inc., member FINRA and subsidiary of Calvert Investments, Inc.

#14911 (06/15)

Contact: Annie M. Cull
Phone: 301.951.4861  / Email-  annie.cull@calvert.com

Source: Calvert

GMJ Spotlight Interview – John Streur, CEO of Calvert

John Streurinterviewed by Elsie Maio

Recently in New York City at the CSR Investing Summit, John Streur, President and CEO of Calvert Investments (www.calvert.com) was interviewed by Elsie Maio, founder of Humanity Inc. & the SoulBranding Institute. John shared some news about a new strategic partnership and some upcoming product offerings.

 

Elsie:  John, you’ve been at Calvert now for 9 months. Any tangible results?

John:  We introduced 3 index funds last month, and will introduce them for global capital markets. Well-priced index funds performing similar to the market comprised of companies that are solving important problems.

The Calvert Large Cap Core Responsible Investing Index is up and running. And while the average mutual fund costs 1%, ours is 19 basis points at institutional share class. Vanguard’s biggest, cheapest is in the 10 basis point range. And, we’ve put in place a new research system, 10 sustainability analysts with expertise on sub-industries to spot emerging risks in the industry, risks to company performance, and risks to society.

ElsieWhat else do you and your team aspire to?

John:  We want to do the work and go to the places where lots of others won’t. I feel real urgency for our society to solve our environmental problem and to solve our inequality problem. I don’t think there’s any time to fool around.

We will engage with policymakers and corporations on data privacy, indigenous issues, and potential discriminatory use of Big Data. No one else [but Calvert] filed a resolution with an insurance company regarding their profiling applications because there may be unintended consequences.

Elsie:  What needs to happen for a critical mass to adopt such innovations in ESG?

John:  The toolset to use, ESG, non-financial information is not fully developed. And yet the whole education and research track is developing in front of our eyes:

  • The CFA Institute is being asked to build this into their educational suite;
  • Certified Alternative Investment Analyst program also is working to develop an ESG track;
  • Academic institutions are creating sustainability degrees, beginning to build those concepts into their business schools; and
  • SASB is working hard to create standards, which will facilitate development of these learning tracks.

Elsie:  Could there be a shadow lurking around the investment community’s embrace of ESG?

John:  We don’t want all these tools to redefine ESG in a strictly profit-seeking sense. You can use this information in a variety of ways — not only to move intergenerational sustainability, equality in every sense, inclusive capital. We can also use it to just generate short-term returns.

Elsie:  John, I sense that you and your family were quite contentedly settled in super-high-quality-of-life-rated Portland, OR. Why did you uproot and move East to lead Calvert?

John:  To participate in change in the global capital markets. Calvert is a values-based investor and as long as I am there we will be. Now we have an opportunity to tie in financial returns with values. It’s critical and if we can do that it will make a significant difference.

Elsie:  The Calvert brand has had its dips. At SoulBranding, we watch the business performance of iconic values-leaders like Calvert closely. What are you doing about brand relevance?

John:  A number of things:

Developing educational material that deals with values. And — I haven’t talked about this previously — our new research partnership with George Serafeim at Harvard, [the Jakurski Family Associate Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School]. The first paper we produce with him will lay out the financial points and the values points. Reaffirming our commitment to our mutual values and mission with the Calvert Foundation

Impact investing is an area where we want to increase our activity.

We will be a lead investor on a new type of security between now and mid-September.

Engagement that’s really productive with corporations and policy makers

[Finally,] creating a more inclusive capitalist system. Larry Summers is saying ‘inclusive prosperity’ — I would say, ‘inclusive’.

We want to distinguish that Calvert is the firm that brings this all together in a way that matters, and people can really join that and do something.

Elsie:  What’s next?

John:  Now it’s a question of the word getting out. 

 

BIOGRAPHIES

John Streur became President and CEO of Calvert Investments in October 2014. His 24 years experience in investment management leadership includes Portfolio 21, Managers Investment Group LLC and its predecessor, a firm he co-founded and where he served as President, CEO and Chair of the Investment Committee.

Elsie Maio is a sherpa to business leaders at the edge of alpha + impact, an alumna of McKinsey&Company and Institutional Investor and founder of Humanity, Inc/SoulBranding Institute.

This interview was edited by Elise Maio. Contact her at-elsiemaio@soulbranding.com

GreenMoney Interview Series:

ImpactAssets

ImpactAssets co-founders Tim Freundlich, Ron Cordes, and Wayne Silby interviewed by GreenMoney founder Cliff Feigenbaum

Recently, GreenMoney founder Cliff Feigenbaum sat down for a conversation with ImpactAssets co-founders Tim Freundlich, Ron Cordes, and Wayne Silby to discuss how they are catalyzing capital to change the world.

Five years ago, Tim, Ron and Wayne recognized the enormous demand for impact investing had not translated into significant capital. They also determined the low capital flows and general lack of awareness were largely due to the absence of a good system for finding, processing and measuring impact investments. To meet that need, they launched ImpactAssets with the initial support of Calvert Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation.

Their first product, The Giving Fund, is a Donor Advised Fund (DAF) that has surpassed $200 million in assets with more than 150 impact investment holdings from over 700 families. They are just about to introduce low minimum, publicly offered debt notes that will help broaden investor access to microfinance and sustainable agriculture investments.

Cliff:  What has the path been for ImpactAssets?

Tim Freundlich, Ron Cordes, and Wayne Silby Tim:  In 2010, we launched ImpactAssets (www.impactassets.org) out of the Calvert Foundation as a non-profit financial services firm that increases the flow of capital into investments that deliver financial, social, and environmental returns. Basically, we’re building a platform to enable asset owners and their wealth managers to advance positive change through investment. Support from impact investing pioneers has been instrumental. Beyond our co-founders, Ron Cordes and Wayne Silby, they include Charly and Lisa Kleissner of KL Felicitas Foundation, Liesel Pritzker Simmons and Ian Simmons of Blue Haven Initiative, Gerhard Pries, as well as Mennonite Economic Development Associates.

Cliff:  How did the three of you get together to launch ImpactAssets?

Wayne:  I was involved in impact investing at Calvert Investments working on the social venture capital activities as well as with Calvert Foundation. Impact investing was still being driven by a few, rather than many – which is not a sustainable ecosystem. Ron wanted to do something with impact, and I was excited when he reached out to me. Ron is a visionary with a reputable track record on Wall Street, and I knew his interest could help move impact investing from the margins to the mainstream. It was a once-in-a-lifetime chance to collaborate and leverage Ron’s leadership, history, and networks.

Ron: I spent the first half of my life building businesses to be the best in the world. For the second half, I really wanted to support businesses that are the best for the world. In 2007, the Cordes Foundation made our first series of impact investments, and we discovered how hard it was to actually find and invest in these firms. We were electronically pounding the pavement, using Google as our guide. There was no centralized infrastructure. One of the funds we discovered was Good Capital, co-founded by Tim. He and I became friends and I became interested in what he was doing at Calvert Foundation, incubating its Donor Advised Fund (DAF). I reached out to Wayne and learned of the Foundation’s intent to spin out the DAF with Tim’s involvement. Wayne is an extraordinary leader, and gets things done. Tim is one of the most creative and entrepreneurial thinkers in the space.

Cliff:  How do Donor Advised Funds work?

Tim:  It’s a three-step process – give, invest and grant. With ImpactAsset’s Giving Fund, you donate philanthropic dollars, grant some immediately, and place the rest in an array of impact investments. Either you recommend those investments, or select from our platform. You make more philanthropic grants as your investment capital grows. The Giving Fund enables you to increase your philanthropic impact by growing your capital through impact investing. It’s unique from other DAF’s in that, for a $5,000 minimum, you can bring your philanthropy and investment capital together to solve world issues.

Cliff:  Why was a DAF your initial means of catalyzing impact capital?

Wayne:  Bringing investments to investors is about the vision, and also about the plumbing – the mechanism of delivery. When the visionaries meet the plumbers, things happen. The DAF enabled us to create that plumbing. As Tim mentioned, what makes this system different is the impact investing platform. You grant some of your investment out, and put the rest directly to work for causes you believe in.

Ron:  The Giving Fund impact investing platform covers all themes, sectors, and geographies, with everything from individual companies to leading venture capital impact disruptors, seed ventures to top-tier impact fund managers. That’s the real differentiator from other donor advised funds in the market.

Tim:  Fran Seegull, ImpactAssets’ Chief Investment Officer, curates the platform. She’s a recognized impact investment leader, with a venture capital background. Her team sources, conducts diligence on and measures financial and impact returns for investments representing one of the most comprehensive, high quality impact portfolios in the market. The portfolio includes over 150 direct company investments, over 50 private debt and equity impact funds, and roughly 15 ESG/SRI mutual funds.

We were also fortunate to tap Jed Emerson as Chief Impact Strategist. He’s been critical in providing high caliber thought leadership and practitioner education that enables investors and their advisors to make informed decisions. He recently co-authored an issue brief, “The Millennial Perspective,” which is an invaluable resource for advisors looking to evolve their practices to serve wealthy millennials interested in impact investing. In 2014, Beth Stelluto came on board as our Chief Growth Officer, and has been instrumental to our 75 percent growth.

Cliff:  How is the annual ImpactAssets 50 list of fund managers representative of your mission as an impact investing catalyst?

Ron:  We recognized there was no source for information on impact investment fund managers. So, at the 2010 Clinton Global Initiative, I introduced the ImpactAssets 50, a free database of the top 50 managers in social and environmental impact investing. It’s available on www.impactassets.org, and is refreshed annually. Today, it’s the go-to resource for those new to impact investing. It’s also become a distinct “feather in the cap” for managers on the list.

Cliff:  The Giving Fund sits at the intersection of impact investment and philanthropy, allowing for a wide array of choices. How do you see donors engaging with the fund?

Tim:  That intersection provides a great deal of flexibility in how donors can engage. Some manifest their giving through impact investing. For others, it’s all about giving. We see three primary ways donor clients utilize The Giving Fund to align their capital with their values.

First, there’s the “Impact Entrepreneur,” who believes entrepreneurship can solve the worlds’ biggest problems. They feel the way to create change and sustainability is by investing capital in innovative, young companies addressing global issues. They’ll often recommend a company they’re interested in. Our investment team will assess the company, and if it checks out, The Giving Fund will invest the donor’s capital into it.

Next, there’s the “Impact Investor,” who likes the access to private debt and equity investments curated by our investment team. They believe true diversification includes more than just public market investing. The Global Impact Ventures Platform and the Seed Venture Platform feature quality investment opportunities with top-tier impact fund managers and individual companies across all stages of growth.

Finally, the “Impact Aligned Philanthropist” is primarily focused on philanthropic granting. Their approach to impact investing within The Giving Fund is a strategic allocation to ESG/SRI mutual funds and impact debt. They’re primarily focused on liquid options for investment, though they have a range of time horizons.

Cliff: What’s next for ImpactAssets?

Ron:  We’ll be launching two Impact Investment Notes this Fall. They’re the first in a range of products accessible outside of the DAF. Their structure is a real game changer. We’re working with Microvest and Alterfin, both highly respected portfolio managers in microfinance and global sustainable agriculture, respectively. The Notes provide far lower investment minimums than typically seen in private debt funds and an attractive rate of return. Plus, they can be bought by and held in your brokerage account. These are critical features for an impact structure that seeks to further democratize impact investing, and great news for advisors and investors seeking ease and transparency.

Wayne:  Our mission is to push the envelope and innovate in ways that continue to break barriers to broad-based impact investing. We have to drive toward what’s needed, what’s missing, and what’s next in areas of research and investment product development, all from our uniquely differentiated position. At the same time, we’re acting within a field with major recent movement from big players like Goldman Sachs, Bain, and BlackRock. That’s creating more substantive commitments to impact investing.

Tim:  For research and field building, we’ll focus on leveraging our massive scope as asset owners across class, sector, geographic and type. Our 150 position impact investment portfolio is adding roughly 10 new positions per month. That presents a unique, increasing opportunity to focus on metrics, impact reporting and research.

We must be a long-term partner to wealth advisors, and serve as a resource over the years as they evolve with the market. We’ll jump forward from the sustainable agriculture and microfinance notes we’re now launching to build a suite of offerings that can meet the market where it is, and pull it forward. As we quickly scale through $1 billion, we’ll become a significant and additive market maker for funds and managers to tap a much more diverse and democratic base of impact investment capital. We’re moving into an accelerating renaissance of capital and entrepreneurship, spurred by generational shifts in assets and values, and made poignant by climate change and wealth and justice gaps.

These are interesting times. Not only can we dream bigger, we must dream bigger.

Biographies:

Ron Cordes – Board Member and Chairman, Executive Committee
Ron has enjoyed an iconic 30-plus year career in the investment industry. He co-founded and then sold AssetMark Investment Services to Genworth Financial in 2006, and was involved in the re-acquisition of the firm with private equity investors in 2013. He is currently Executive Co-Chairman of AssetMark, which is responsible for over $25 billion in assets under management for individual and institutional clients. He is co-author of “The Art of Investing & Portfolio Management,” published in 2004 by McGraw Hill, and was recognized as an Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year in 2005. He holds a BS in Business Administration from the University of California, Berkeley. Ron speaks and writes extensively on the field of impact investing, and has been profiled in publications including The New York Times, Forbes, Fast Company, Financial Planning and Financial Advisor magazines. He is a co-founder with his wife, Marty, of the Cordes Foundation, and serves on the Boards of FairTrade USA, Encore.org, ImpactAssets, MicroVest and the Center for Social Impact Learning at the Middlebury Institute.

Wayne Silby – Chairman, Board of Directors, Executive Committee & Investment Committee Member
Wayne Silby founded Calvert Investments, a $15B investment management group in Bethesda, MD, noted for its leadership in the area of socially responsible investment. Though he is no longer active in most of the day-to-day business of Calvert, he serves as president of Calvert Social Investment Fund and supervises its private equity activities. Mr. Silby also co-founded Social Venture Network, a group of socially oriented entrepreneurs and investors, and Calvert Social Venture Partners, one of the first socially-oriented venture capital funds. He helped start an Internet company focused on group collaboration, called GroupServe Foundation, which he now chairs. He also started the Emerging Europe Fund for Sustainable Investment, a $60M Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) private equity fund focused on Central Europe. Mr. Silby sits on the board of UNIFI, the Calvert Foundation, Calvert Funds, the Ice Organization (UK), Syntao (Beijing), Committee for the Future (DC) and the Grameen Foundation. He serves as the Chairman of the ImpactAssets Board of Directors and also serves on ImpactAssets’ Investment Committee. He has a Bachelor of Science in economics from the Wharton School of Finance at the University of Pennsylvania, and a Juris Doctor from the Georgetown University Law Center.

Tim Freundlich – President
Mr. Freundlich is a long-time innovator in new financial instruments in the social enterprise sector, which he now applies as the head of ImpactAssets. He has served in a number of capacities at Calvert Foundation over the last fourteen years, including his current role as special consultant. At Calvert Foundation, he conceived of and launched the Giving Fund, was instrumental in building the $225 million Calvert Community Investment Note and helped to launch Community Investment Partners, an analysis and asset administration business. He co-founded and serves as managing partner for Good Capital, including its flagship Social Enterprise Expansion Fund LP and its two operating spin outs: 1) the annual Social Capital Markets (SOCAP) conferences in San Francisco and Europe and 2) Hub Bay Area, a co-working, meeting and community space. Additionally, he serves on the steering committee of Hub North America. He received a Bachelor of Arts from Wesleyan University and a Master of Business Administration from the University of San Francisco.

GreenMoney Interview Series

Hunter Lovins, President of Natural Capitalism Solutions interviewed by impact investor and entrepreneur Donna Morton.Hunter Lovins, President of Natural Capitalism Solutions interviewed by impact investor and entrepreneur Donna Morton.

Most people believe you can invest for value or invest in your values; you cannot have both. Impact investor and entrepreneur Donna Morton interviews Hunter Lovins, president of Natural Capitalism Solutions on how to build public market investment strategies that moves money from harm to healing. This interview looks at why Hunter believes finance is a powerful tool to stem climate change, address extreme poverty and grow the world we want. Hunter also gives us some insights about her new investment firm she co-founded with Donna, Principium Investments. So going beyond CSR, and leaving old school SRI behind, they discuss the new frontiers of impact investing in public markets, integrating ESG and developing divestment and investment strategies for the 21st Century.

 

Donna:  We know your work on sustainability with Fortune 500 companies, your talks and books; what possessed you to want to build a finance company?

Hunter:  Finance is the key to the transition to what Bucky Fuller called a world that works for 100 percent of humanity. Without beginning to move money from harm to healing, we will not achieve the transition of which we all dream.

That said, left to my own devices, it would never have occurred to me to help build a finance company. Through my work at the Unreasonable Institute[1], I met Michael Tracy, who was looking to move his 25 years expertise in managing money from traditional investment to impact investment. He and I both met you, Donna, who was a Fellow at Unreasonable. She is also an Ashoka Fellow[2] and Ugunte Fellow[3]. The three of us began conversations that led to working together. We then pulled in various other team members, and during a marvelous week at the SOCAP Conference[4], confirmed our intention to build a truly transformative finance company. Described as “Occupy meets Wall Street,” it springs from our values that finance should serve the real economy, not only flow money as fast as possible to the 80 people who, Oxfam tells us, have as much wealth as the 3.5 billion poorest people on earth[5].

Donna:  Why finance?

Hunter:  John Fullerton of Capital Institute[6], in his paper “Limits to Investment,”[7] points out that all investment has impact. The planet is being damaged daily by companies making the ordinary investments they believe will enable them to grow and profit. Business as usual is threatening the ability of the planet to sustain life.

If we invest in companies that have committed to behave in more sustainable ways, companies that are conscious of their impacts and are seeking to minimize them, or better, to have positive impacts on health, well being, and the environment, we will do two things to implement a more regenerative economy:

First, we will profit, because there is now a strong business case for behaving more sustainably. Taking early and aggressive action to cut emissions and implement climate protection turns out, as I described in my book The Way Out: Kick-Starting Capitalism to save Our Economic Ass [8], to be very good business. The September 2014 CDP “Climate Action and Profitability” study showed that companies that integrate sustainability into business strategies outperform those who fail to show such leadership. Companies that are managing their carbon emissions and are planning for climate change enjoy 18% higher returns on their investment than companies that aren’t, and 67% higher than companies that refuse to disclose their emissions. These companies are simply better managed, and, all things equal, are more likely to be better investments.

Second, moving money from harm to healing shifts markets. Taking money out of bad things, and putting it into companies that drive better behavior in the world, makes a difference. The Oxford’s Stranded Assets Programme’s Report concluded, “Divestment outflows, even when relatively meagre in the first wave of divestment, can significantly and permanently depress stock price of a target firm if they trigger a change in market norms.

How money is invested—whether by companies, by colleges, or by you—

determines whether we trash the planet or save it.

Donna:  Why focus on public markets?

Hunter:  Again, all investment has impact. It is important to invest for positive impact in the private markets, as well, but the flows of money in public markets is a place every investor can start. We harness the power of public markets to reward companies that are growing in good ways. We are removing capital from companies, and sectors, that drive harm.

By investing in companies like Unilever[9] that are committing to source 100 percent of their energy from renewable energy and to source 100 percent of their feedstocks from sustainable agriculture, we are enhancing the market power, prestige and capability of the companies that are doing the right thing.

But even more, we are committed to reinvest our profits into start-ups that are building the new economy: the companies that graduate from the Unreasonable Institute and Ashoka-vetted businesses that are delivering ways to regenerate natural systems, cultures, and communities. My friend Jigar Shah says that we need to move $1 trillion a year into clean energy. Only $4.5 billion a year is now going there. Our goal is to be as profitable as we can so that we can recycle those profits to drive even greater impact.

Donna:  You organized Principium differently from most finance companies. Why?

Hunter:  Over the years I have advised investment houses from Calvert when it was first created, to Portfolio 21, to now Principium. All are excellent organizations, but this one is different.

Women make up the majority of the Principium team. It is diverse in ethnic makeup and nationalities. More, it is committed to the use of systems thinking to craft its strategy.

We built the metrics that guide Principium’s investments from first principles, using John Fullerton’s Regenerative Capitalism as the basis[10]. We integrated these concepts with the company’s shared commitment to social justice, gender equality, protection of indigenous rights, and sustainability. That means that it isn’t just divested from fossil fuels, but also other companies and sectors that do harm: it doesn’t invest in Exxon, nor does it invest in Monsanto. We then blended these non-negotiable core values with Michael Tracy’s 25-year expertise in managing money. We review a company’s fundamentals; the recommendations of analysts; environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance; and our own knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of corporate management, to pick the securities we want to own.

The investment committee meets monthly to review the portfolios, shedding any companies that may have fallen short, adding new ones that pass the various evaluations, and continually refining its practices.

Donna:  How do you and Principium feel about Divestment versus shareholder activism?  Do you offer “Divestment” products?

Hunter:  Both are important, but for a small outfit like Principium, the most potent action would be to create what may be the only truly fossil fuel free portfolio, and structure it so that ordinary people can invest in it.

Kudos to the people like my friend Natasha Lamb [11] who are actively lodging shareholder resolutions, and actively voting their shares. But for smaller investors, one action you can take is to ensure that you no longer own any fossil fuel companies. Of all emissions since the industrial revolution, half have been emitted since 1986. As Ellen Dorsey [12] says, if you own fossil fuel stocks, you own climate change.

Nearly two-thirds of carbon dioxide and methane emissions can be attributed to 90 entities. This number comes from a quantitative analysis[13] of the historic fossil fuel and cement production records of the 50 leading investor-owned, 31 state-owned, and 9 nation-state producers of oil, natural gas, coal, and cement. From the beginning of the industrial revolution to 2010, 63 percent of cumulative worldwide emissions of industrial CO2 and methane were put out by the 90 “carbon major” entities. Cumulatively, emissions of 315 GtCO2e have been traced to investor-owned entities, 288 GtCO2e were emitted by state-owned enterprises, and 312 GtCO2e by nation-states. But this is only the beginning: these carbon major entities own fossil fuel reserves that will, if extracted and emitted, make climate catastrophe inevitable. Carbon Tracker’s math says that humanity can emit only 565 more GtCO2e and have a prayer of staying below 2 degrees C warming. But the fossil companies have 2,795 GtCO2e in their proven reserves and are ceaselessly exploring for more. Their business model is to dig up all this fossil carbon and burn it. Unless, we stop them.

Investments in these companies enable them to retain the legitimacy to drive climate change, which many of us believe is the greatest threat to human survival and to the survival of life as we know it on the planet.

I’m out. I simply cannot do the work that I do and own such companies. I moved all of what money I have that does not go to support the work of Natural Capitalism to our truly fossil fuel free portfolio. I also sold my beloved, elderly Porsche and bought a Leaf, which I power from a 5 kW solar array on my ranch.

Donna:  What about people who want to invest more directly in private companies, in local businesses or geographic areas like sub Saharan Africa?

Hunter:  Unlike most finance companies, our team understands that the private sector needs to work strategically with the NGO community and such public interest financial organizations as credit unions. To make this possible, we are building Impact2X to enable high net worth clients to leverage their assets to support community funds and others to invest in businesses run by under-served entrepreneurs.

Impact2X allows investors to double their impact by making low-interest loans to Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) and Microfinance Institutions (MFIs), which put capital in the hands of the undercapitalized and helps lift people out of poverty.

In partnership with our custodian, Principium extends the below-market borrowing rates available to investors, through a margin account, to CDFIs and MFIs. This enables these institutions to serve entrepreneurs and communities that have been traditionally excluded from the financial system or charged exorbitant rates to participate. This is financial innovation that matters.

Inner cities, Native communities, the rural poor, and women entrepreneurs face barriers to accessing affordable capital. Impact2X can enable innovators marginalized by skin, geography, or gender to change the game. Not only is the current system, which leaves many marginalized people out of the economy, immoral, it robs the world of their creative genius, which we believe is essential to healing what is broken and generating more disruptive innovation globally.

Donna:  What will be different in 20 years if you are successful?

Hunter:  We will have played a catalytic role in transforming the finance sector. We will have moved billions of dollars ourselves, and inspired others to drive trillions of dollars, globally, out of harmful companies and into the Regenerative Economy: into companies committed to serve people and the planet. We literally will have built an economy in service to life.

What does it take to do this? We just need each one of you to join us.

Disclosure: This interview reflects Hunter’s own personal opinions and does not necessarily reflect the views of Principium Investments. Neither person received any compensation for the interview. Donna Morton is a proud investor in Unilever and a whole portfolio of other great companies through having Principium manage her money.

Article Links:

[1]  http://unreasonableinstitute.org/

[2]  https://www.ashoka.org/fellows

[3]  https://www.ogunte.com/

[4]  http://socialcapitalmarkets.net/

[5] https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/ib-wealth-having-all-wanting-more-190115-en.pdf

[6]  http://capitalinstitute.org/

[7]  http://www.greattransition.org/publication/limits-to-investment

[8]  http://amzn.to/JJtZCc

[9]  https://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/the-sustainable-living-plan/our-strategy/

[10]  http://capitalinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2015-Regenerative-Capitalism-4-20-15-final.pdf

[11]  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCd5jlNgPG1deR0XJ62oSIdw

[12]  http://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/3386594/asset-management-hedge-funds-and-alternatives/environmental-activist-ellen-dorsey-pushes-fossil-fuel-divestment.html#.VcFDQ5NVhBc

[13]  http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-013-0986-y

Biographies:

Hunter Lovins is President of Natural Capitalism Solutions (NCS,) a Colorado non-profit that educates senior decision makers in the business case for a Regenerative Economy. NCS, helps companies, communities and countries implement more sustainable practices profitably.

Trained as a sociologist and lawyer (JD), Hunter is a professor of sustainable business management at Bard College, and Denver University; and the chief insurgent of the Madrone Project. Named a Master at the Chinese De Tao Academy, she recently helped launch the Institute for Green Investment in Shanghai.

Lovins has consulted for scores of industries and governments worldwide, including International Finance Corporation, Unilever, Walmart, the United Nations and Royal Dutch Shell, as well as sustainability champions Interface, Patagonia and Clif Bar. She has briefed heads of state, leaders of the numerous local governments, the Pentagon, and about 30 other countries, as well as the UN, and the US Congress.

Hunter lectures regularly to audiences around the globe. She has worked in economic development in countries from Afghanistan to New Zealand, served the King of Bhutan on his International Expert Working Group, charged with transforming the global economy. She sits on the steering committee of the Alliance for Sustainability and Prosperity, and Capital Institute Advisory Board. A founding mentor of the Unreasonable Institute, she teaches entrepreneuring and coaches social enterprises around the world. She is a founding partner in Principium, an impact investing firm.

Hunter has written 15 books and hundreds of articles. The Way Out: Kick-Starting Capitalism to Save Our Economic Ass (2012) succeeds her international best-selling book, Natural Capitalism, now used in hundreds of colleges. Her latest, Creating a Lean and Green Business System won the 2014 Shingo Prize for Excellence in Manufacturing Research.

Hunter has worked in sustainability policy since 1972. She was instrumental in creating the fields of Economic Renewal, Green Development, and Sustainable Management. She has helped create several MBA schools and is currently professor of Sustainable Business at Bard MBA. She has won dozens of awards, including the European Sustainability Pioneer award, the Right Livelihood Award (the alternative Nobel) and the 2012 the Rachel Carson Award. In 2013 she was inducted into the Hall of Fame of the International Society of Sustainability Professionals. Time Magazine recognized her as a Millennium Hero for the Planet, and Newsweek called her the Green Business Icon.

Donna Morton, Managing director, Business Strategies
Donna is an Ashoka, Ogunte and Unreasonable fellow and lifelong serial social entrepreneur. Co-founder of Principium Investments – Public market investing in healing and divesting from harm. As part of the portfolio management team, Donna has co-design investment processes that seek alpha through net positive strategies and avoid the risks of carbon assets and loss of social license. 

Her other ventures included co-founder of SunDrum; Youth Social Entrepreneurship – Education through Art, Culture and Games; and First Power, a B Corporation with a mission to put clean energy, jobs and equity in the hands of first nations; and she is helping to put carbon taxes on the map in Canada and North America through the Centre for Integral Economics.

Donna has extensive and international experience in sustainability, start-ups and communications and storytelling. Her experience ranges from NGOs, building think tanks, and innovative private companies. Her work has been profiled in Fast Company, The Guardian, and in the “Act for the Planet” TV series, which aired around the world.

Impact Investing: Aligning Capital with the Conservation of Nature

By Mark R. Tercek, President and CEO of The Nature Conservancy ,

Mark R. Tercek

Today’s environmental challenges are bigger than ever. And a rapidly growing population coupled with climate change will only exacerbate current threats. Big challenges like these will require bold solutions. The environmental movement must try new approaches and scale up our work so it’s bigger, better and faster.

Although our usual sources of funding—traditional philanthropy and government grants—are critically important, those sources can only take us so far. That’s why we’re excited about impact investing, a new conservation strategy that could have a tremendous impact in the environmental arena.

Impact capital—money invested in projects that provide a return on investment while driving positive societal impacts—is taking off in areas ranging from childhood education to clean tech. Although it’s still an emerging way to finance conservation, impact investing could unlock significant environmental progress—and significant returns for investors looking to align their portfolios with their values. Investors receive a below-market financial return coupled with a measurable environmental return. Together, the two pieces add up to a robust return on investment. Meanwhile, investees put the capital to work on large-scale, replicable conservation projects.

 The Nature Conservancy

A year ago, my organization The Nature Conservancy (TNC), joined forces with JPMorgan Chase to launch NatureVest, an impact capital initiative that bridges the gap between conservation projects and potential investors. The conservation field is ripe with opportunities for impact investing—activities that offer cash flows, adequate risk-to-return ratios, solid track records and broad impacts. Projects range from sustainable timber and ranching to water and carbon offset markets. NatureVest and other groups are now building a robust pipeline of projects that wouldn’t be possible without impact capital.

For example, NatureVest’s first project was a traditional land transaction taken to a whole new scale—a 165,000-acre, $134 million acquisition in Washington’s Cascade Mountains and Montana’s Blackfoot River Valley. The deal is enormously strategic. It links millions of acres of wildlife habitat, protecting privately owned parcels that were dispersed among public lands and at risk of being developed, fragmenting the habitat. The lands also preserve the headwaters of the Yakima River, an important source of drinking water for the region.

It would have been very difficult to accomplish a deal with such a high price tag through traditional philanthropy alone. That’s where impact investments came in. Through NatureVest, impact investors provided 95 percent of the capital for the deal, allowing TNC to act quickly to purchase the lands. The bulk of the capital was provided at very attractive terms, as low-cost, long-term financing.

And it’s not just traditional land conservation that can benefit from impact investments. In northern Kenya’s rangelands, NatureVest is investing in cattle herding communities who agree to improve grazing practices. Through a $13 million deal—a combination of philanthropy and impact investment—we’re scaling up a program launched by Northern Rangelands Trust that buys cattle directly from herders at reasonable prices, feeds the cattle on sustainably grazed, nutrient-rich grasses, then processes the meat to sell to the Nairobi market at higher prices than the herders would have received on their own. The initiative generates positive financial, social and conservation outcomes. A portion of the additional profits received at the market goes directly to the herding communities for conservation, healthcare, education and anti-poaching security measures.

Here in the U.S., there’s a big opportunity for impact investment as cities turn to nature to manage storm water runoff, a major source of pollution for local waterways. Natural solutions such as rain gardens, green roofs and artificial wetlands soak up runoff, slowing the water’s flow and reducing its volume before it reaches already-stressed sewer systems.

With stretched municipal budgets, “green infrastructure” is a no-brainer—it’s a smart and cost-effective approach to protecting water sources while improving quality of life. To tap into this, NatureVest will launch a new development company to take advantage of an innovative Washington, D.C., regulation that creates a market for impact investors to finance green infrastructure that helps with storm water retention. The company will build green infrastructure projects and sell credits for storm water capture to developers, catalyzing an important new environmental market. The retention projects will create green space in underserved D.C. communities and protect waterways, while credit sales will create returns for investors. Through projects like these, impact investing can benefit everyone involved—local communities, investors, financial institutions and NGOs.

While our big capital-intensive conservation projects have long been supported by investors such as Hansjörg Wyss, Julian Robertson, Jeremy Grantham and others, for TNC, impact capital allows us to get more conservation done at scale. It helps us develop relationships with new types of capital providers. And, perhaps most importantly, the resulting dialogue with investors about how our projects perform against projected cash flows pushes TNC to be ever more precise in measuring the outcomes of our conservation work. And for JPMorgan Chase, the company’s employees get to use their financial expertise to help solve big environmental challenges.

Looking forward, our organizations are excited about what lies ahead. We now have a pipeline for novel transactions that will have big conservation impacts and would be very difficult to do without this partnership. We don’t view this type of collaboration as exclusive to TNC or JPMorgan Chase—we’re eager to work with other conservation organizations and other financial institutions. In fact, non-financial private-sector players and other nonprofits—including those outside the environmental space—could also benefit from this type of partnership.

We’re looking forward to discovering the countless conservation solutions impact investing can bring about, and we’re excited about the deals that nonprofits and private investors can make possible by working together.

 

Article by Mark Tercek, president and CEO of The Nature Conservancy (www.nature.org), the world’s largest conservation organization. He is the author of “Nature’s Fortune: How Business and Society Thrive by Investing in Nature,” released this summer in paperback. Before joining the Nature Conservancy in 2008, he was a partner and managing director of Goldman Sachs where he worked for 24 years. Follow Mark on Twitter @MarkTercek

In the Right Place Now: Impact Investing

Domini Social Investments

By Amy Domini, founder of Domini Social Investments and partner in The Sustainability Group

Amy Domini

The forty-five year arc of positive impact, resultant from the actions of responsible investors, is evident today in human rights, ecological improvements, in the behavior of government and non-governmental organizations, and has brought true empowerment to the smallest investor. I date the modern era from the decision, at the behest of shareholder activists, to elect a black man, the Reverend Leon Sullivan, to the board of directors of General Motors. It began in 1970 when Ralph Nader and a group of Washington DC-based lawyers filed nine resolutions with the company, one of which asked for greater racial and environmental voices on the board.

Prior to that point, and throughout history, investors have shaped economic enterprises in such a way as to create a community good, and the actions of the so-called, Campaign to Make General Motors Responsible, were not the first to attempt to make positive outcomes through shareholder actions. But this group launched a thousand ships. From this initiative, we can trace the tactics of shareholder activists, the strategies of divestment campaigns, the support for non-traditional economic models, and the panoply of what we now call impact investing.

To begin with, this group of shareholder activists addressed the core two issues: people and the planet. They reasoned, as we still do, that the voices of leadership of a company must include those with a diversity of expertise, that companies have a diversity of impacts and that leadership must consider these when making management decisions. From this campaign, grew a great corporate board member, the Reverend Leon Sullivan. He argued that it was necessary to measure progress that General Motors and other companies doing business in South Africa were making. He argued that the data should be measurable with a number or a yes/no answer and that they should indicate something meaningful. In building the research methodology at Kinder, Lydenberg & Domini we used these two points as key to our own research. Today they are universally imbedded in the corporate responsibility research process globally.

It is worth pausing here to acknowledge the single most important and certainly the most powerful positive social change brought about by the once called, ‘socially responsible’ or even ‘ethical’ investor. Relatively standardized, on-going, corporate responsibility reporting is a given today. For those operating during the era of the Sullivan Principals, it was too distant to be a concept. Nothing has moved so many behaviors, not law, not consumer behavior, not ‘doing the right thing’ on the part of the elite, nothing has created the mechanism of permanent ongoing improvement in the human condition by corporations and society as this global reporting. Rarely does the small investor, making an IRA decision, have the chance to serve the future of the planet along with her own self-betterment so completely. From the simple acorn of tracking corporate largesse in South Africa, grew this mighty oak.

The campaign over corporate behavior in South Africa gained steam when the Sullivan Principals began to prove that American companies were not building a new, Apartheid-free, South Africa. Disappointing as this proof was to its designers, it was now obvious to all that American companies were aiding and abetting a strengthening of the system of a nation that denied the vote to the vast majority of its citizens. Now the divestment movement began in earnest. It was a big one. In 1984 the decision to divest was the decision to drop 162 companies and 48 percent of the Standard & Poor’s 500 index. No divestment movement since then has come anything close to having that sort of proportion of the investable universe removed. And

recall that this was in the era when overseas companies were a good deal more difficult to purchase and most American investors favored the large capitalization American companies that the S&P 500 represented.

This effort, and the worldwide distain for South African leadership that resulted, provided the lever that was needed. The government of South Africa negotiated with Black leadership to bring about an election. The full participation of citizens would be included. Most importantly, Nelson Mandela, who had spent 27 years in prison for his support for a true democracy in his homeland, was a part of the elections. Though the election did not take place until April 27, 1994, from the time the election was set, the outcome was certain. In fact, I have in my files, responses from shareholders in the Domini Social Equity Fund to my letter of inquiry. Should we remove the boycott or wait for the vote? The vast majority urged us to drop the boycott as a declaration of support for the success of the vote.

Looking back over the years, it is now clear that this strong and unified initiative might well have faded into the history books had it not resulted in a relatively small cadre of committed investors and the template for expanding corporate accountability research. Without the fire of the South African debate, the field ran the risk of becoming a menu of divestment choices. Indeed, several mutual funds started with narrow goals, such as animal rights, women in leadership, and alternative energy. But they failed to collect the assets to really grow them into a movement. No, the public understood that the value proposition was this, “I believe that the way I invest can make a better world.” It was not about how, but what.

Given that there were newsletters and funds, asset managers and endowments, that embraced this simpler message, Steve Lydenberg, Peter Kinder and I set out to strengthen them. Our idea was simple. We would deliver the tools they needed to make the concept that “the way you invest matters” universally accepted. For this we saw meeting three barriers to success head on. The first two have been overcome; the third will need to be overcome with every new generation of investor.

The barriers we saw were these: 1. There was an assumption that money would be lost if managers took a look at “extra-financial” issues. This then meant that to do so would be a violation of their fiduciary responsibility.  2.  The values were hard to organize. One couldn’t rate the value of a baby born without eyes versus the enforced labor in factories far off the beaten track. In short, research needed to be developed and shaped in such a way as to make conclusions possible. 3. There continues to be a concern about what is the “best” way to bring about change. Should we focus only on philanthropy? On government solutions? Was investing really just opting in to a broken system? KLD Research & Analytics was created to remove these barriers.

The history of the firm could be a book in itself. Suffice it to say that the construction of what was initially called the Domini 400 Social Index and is now called MSCI KLD 400 Index has removed barrier number 1. The development of a data-based system, called SOCRATES, and the firm’s commitment to sharing methodology with like groups globally has removed barrier number 2. The growth of the availability and use of corporate accountability research tools had demonstrated absolutely that a void has been filled. Only the socially responsible investor asked for, even fought for, the data that makes ongoing social improvement a part of the corporate-human dialog. Number 3 was answered for our generation. Only we could have created the most important impact, permanent data collection.

Through the past thirty years, several important efforts have grown awareness in the role that investors have in bringing about a world with universal human dignity and ecological sustainability. We fought over fair access to jobs in Northern Ireland, over the military control of Burma, the genocide in Sudan. We launched climate awareness efforts and studies about the role of women in leadership. The field grew abroad more rapidly than domestically.

The United Nations took an interest. From it grew standards for money management firms and a statement of fiduciary obligation that would give comfort to fiduciaries everywhere. Exchanges in South Africa, Malaysia, Brazil and others mandated disclosure of a broader impact of listed companies on society. Companies adapted, publishing corporate sustainability reports and naming chief sustainability officers.

Meanwhile, the ever-changing vocabulary of our field continued. It astonished me to learn that business schools now teach that first there was socially responsible investing, which was avoiding alcohol, tobacco, etc. It was never that. I should know, I wrote the first book, Ethical Investing, with Peter Kinder. In it we pointed out that we were investors, not ‘divestors’, so the core of our efforts were to find purchases. We applied this to all purchases, across all asset classes, venture capital, commodities, all of them.

I first heard the phrase “impact investing” about 15 years ago in Europe. The Europeans meant direct investment in venture capital ideas that would make the world better. It took a while for me to understand that they saw this as not the same thing as “buy what you want to own.” But as the idea caught hold in the United States, impact investing became synonymous with making direct, generally venture, investments into companies that make something that was really good for empowering people or making a more verdant land. I didn’t like it. It ignorantly ignored the tremendous progress ethical investors had made.

Finally came “impact investing across all asset classes.” I believe that this is where we want to be. It acknowledges that some classes provide narrow bore, but potentially marvelous solutions, such as low cost potable water through venture capital, while other assets provide wide bore, but visible only to intellectually engaged investors, such as responsibility reporting through equity purchasing. Still others are quite specific, like removing gun accessories from stores. Most importantly impact investing across all asset classes has the effect of honoring our past and bringing our parts together in a single fabric of making the world a better place, of acknowledging that investors to have a voice, and it should be a positive voice in each investor’s own area of strength.

Article by Amy Domini, partner in The Sustainability Group in Boston where she manages roughly $1.1 billion in liquid assets for high net worth families. Additionally she is the founder of Domini Social Investments (www.domini.com), a New York City based mutual fund family with $1.6 billion under management. She is widely recognized as the leading voice for socially responsible investing. In 2005 she was named to the Time magazine 100 list of the world’s most influential people, and in 2009 Time listed her as one of 25 “Responsibility Pioneers”. In 2005, President Clinton honored her at the inaugural meeting of the Clinton Global Initiative.

Ms. Domini co-authored the groundbreaking book, Ethical Investing in 1984. Since then she has authored or co-authored several books. Her articles have been widely published and she is a regular contributor to The Intelligent Optimist magazine. Ms. Domini serves or has served on several boards and holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation.

Ms. Domini holds a B.A. in international and comparative studies from Boston University. She is the recipient of two honorary degrees: a Doctor of Business Administration, from Northeastern University College of Law and a Doctor of Humane Letters by the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale.

 

The First Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Criteria and Investor Progress

Calvert Investments
By Reed Montague
of Calvert Investments

Reed Montague

Calvert Investments (www.calvert.com) launched its Indigenous Peoples’ rights stand-alone criteria in 1999, making it the nation’s first asset manager with a separate comprehensive approach on such issues. The criteria formally articulated the company’s commitment to address the basic rights and fundamental freedoms that Indigenous People deserve and which were regularly being violated, including sovereignty and intellectual property rights. Previously, Calvert had considered these issues as part of a broader set of human rights criteria. This specialized criteria, created one of the very first mechanisms in advocating for Indigenous Peoples’ rights at companies, elevating the prominence of such issues and supporting their efforts to be heard in the corporate boardroom, where they were poorly represented at the time. Given that Indigenous Peoples often live in areas that contain the world’s last untapped resources, their communities were increasingly under assault by global corporations.

Calvert developed its Indigenous Peoples’ rights criteria with input from Calvert Funds board member Rebecca Adamson, a Cherokee, former president of First Nations Development Institute and now head of First Peoples Worldwide. The company also consulted with representatives from several other organizations recognized for American Indian economic development and advocacy in the process of finalizing its broad multi-pronged criteria. Since then, the criteria on Indigenous Peoples’ rights, as with the company’s overall responsible investment approach, continues to evolve.

Other investment firms have also developed specific criteria on Indigenous Peoples’ rights, including Boston Common, Trillium Asset Management, and Walden Asset Management. In addition, the Oneida Nation of Wisconsin’s Trust Committee first began considering these issues in 1994 and began engaging Walmart over sacred sites/burial ground issues in 1999. Both individually and collectively, Oneida and these firms have engaged numerous companies, furthering the rights of Indigenous Peoples and heightening the sensitivity and awareness of such companies as they impact Indigenous Peoples around the globe.

Although challenges remain, awareness of the rights of Indigenous Peoples has significantly increased. Responsible investment firms have encouraged various oil and gas companies to develop policies that require them to consider their impacts on Indigenous communities. To date, Conoco Phillips, ExxonMobil, Suncor Energy, and Devon Energy have done so. Responsible investment firms also supported the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), signed by President Obama in December 2010, with the U.S. being the last country to do so. UNDRIP sets out both individual and collective rights of Indigenous Peoples’ as well as their rights regarding a variety of issues including access; consultation and Free, Prior and Informed Consent; culture and language; economic development; education; health; individuals; intellectual property; lands, territories and resources; non-discrimination; self-determination; social welfare; and state obligations.

In another example, Pebble Mine – a proposed copper, gold, and molybdenum mine to be situated at the headwaters of the Bristol Bay Fishery in Alaska, which would have been owned by Anglo-American, Rio Tinto and Northern Dynasty – was challenged by investors, environmental groups and tribes, with six petitioning the EPA to invoke a little used provision of the Clean Water Act to block development. Probably the most powerful opponent of the mine was the Alaska Native Corporation, representing Alaskan natives and their tribes. The watershed produces half the world’s commercial supply of wild sockeye salmon and the EPA estimated that the proposed open pit mine would cause significant negative impacts. Thirty investors sent a letter to the EPA commenting on its draft assessment and urging it to review mining activity in that area, and engaged directly with Anglo-American and Rio Tinto, emphasizing not only the environmental impact but also how Indigenous communities would be affected and the associated risk to the mining companies. These two major mining companies each decided to cease their involvement with the proposed mine. In 2014, the EPA initiated a process to protect the fishery from mining activities under the Clean Water Act. While the EPA action has been challenged in court, the agency’s move was a major victory for those concerned about the potential impacts of the mine on the way of life and the environment in Bristol Bay.

In the nearly two decades since Calvert launched its Indigenous Peoples’ rights criteria, some progress has been made, although more work remains. Many tribes are more now knowledgeable in engaging with corporations. They chart new territory, understand media impact, and demonstrate savvy investment and activism skills – all while blazing new trails for others to follow. In some instances, companies are more willing to listen and engage both with investors and Indigenous Peoples on the issues and rights that matter most. Meanwhile, investors continue to support key issues that respect the rights and needs of Native peoples, while also offering support on policy issues. Until such time as these issues can be fully resolved and our societies value all perspectives equally, responsible investors will continue to have a valuable role in the support of Indigenous Peoples and their rights.

For more information on how your investments or those of your clients can better support Indigenous Peoples’ rights, please visit the Indigenous Peoples Working Group of U.S. SIF at http://www.ussif.org/ipwg

(#14896, 06/2015)

Article by Reed Montague, Sustainability Analyst at Calvert Investments, Inc. where she specializes in Indigenous Peoples’ rights, particularly around offensive images, and product marketing issues. She also specializes in the healthcare and media industries and her advocacy activities have focused on increasing sustainability disclosure and Indigenous Peoples’ rights. In addition, she works on a variety of projects that further the company’s sustainability. Previously, she managed the company’s relationship with the Calvert Social Investment Fund Advisory Council for many years, handled strategic partnerships and helped launch the Calvert Foundation. Prior to joining Calvert, she worked in the fields of business ethics and international trade. She earned a BA in Psychology and Yugoslav Studies from Connecticut College and is FINRA Series 7 licensed.

Signup to receive GreenMoney's monthly eJournal

Privacy Policy
Copyright © GreenMoney Journal 2024

Website design & development by BrandNature

Global Events Calendar

View All Events

september

10sepAll Day11Sustainability LIVE Conference - London

10sepAll Day12Innovate4Climate – Berlin

11sepAll Day12Responsible Investor Canada 2024 – Toronto

X