Tag: Featured Articles

Powering a Sustainable Future with Clean Energy Credit Union

By Nicole Burford, Clean Energy Credit Union

Energy & Climate, Featured Articles, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

The Intersectional Opportunity of Solar: Addressing Climate and Inequality

By Jonathan Abe and Martha Buckley, Sunwealth

Energy & Climate, Featured Articles, Impact Investing

Investing in an Era of Extreme Weather

By Marian Macindoe, Robert Klaber and Lori Keith, Parnassus Investments

Energy & Climate, Featured Articles, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

Redefining How Buildings Use Energy

By Sarah Adams, Vert Asset Management

Energy & Climate, Featured Articles, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

Capitalizing on New Opportunities for a Clean Grid

By Rebekah Saul Butler, Gratitude Railroad

Above: Plankton Energy solar development in Hopkinton, MA

Gratitude Railroad has long maintained that impact investing is synonymous with a focus on the long-term, since we believe that the businesses and industries that will drive value for investors are those that will help build a more sustainable and equitable future. Consistent with this view and an understanding that the green transition would be full of both economic and impact potential, we have tracked and selectively backed renewables-related companies and funds since our inception more than a decade ago.

We have seen momentum in this space in recent years – including in 2023 and 2024, a time of overall decline in venture and emerging impact fund investing (areas on which we focus). Climate investing was not insulated from macroeconomic conditions, but investment in maturing industries, in particular, persisted.1 Renewables hit some notable high marks in the U.S. in 20232 – including that 42GW of new renewable power generating capacity was added to the grid; and the U.S.’s overall investment in the energy transition hit $303B, up 68% since 2020. These larger trends were mirrored within our own investor community, who demonstrated continued interest in climate tech deployment.

Policy also plays an important part in this story, as provisions from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law designed to stimulate climate investment are being implemented. We have seen this first-hand as tax credits, government-backed lending facilities, and grant programs have all shown up in early-stage business models and new fund strategies – as “tailwinds” for sustainable companies that are innovating solutions for expanding consumer and business markets. Indeed, the policy changes contributed to two of our recent moves: expanding our investment in solar and investing in EV (Electric Vehicle) charging. These both fit under our climate justice investment thesis, which engages a dual lens of greenhouse gas emissions and social equity.

Expanding Solar Access

Gratitude Railroad made its initial foray into solar in 2020 with a seed-stage investment in Solstice, a community solar subscription company with a strong justice orientation. (Community solar allows customers to subscribe to a local installation in a common space, such as on a school or warehouse facility, extending the benefits of lower energy bills to low- and moderate-income customers and people living in multifamily housing.) We were excited by the founders’ commitment to democratizing solar and to using key organizing principles, alongside technology, to solve customer acquisition and management pain points. The company was later acquired by Mitsui & Co., and continues to be a leader in community solar subscription services and more broadly in solar access.

In 2021, Gratitude invested in PosiGen, a national leader in residential solar for low- and moderate-income (LMI) households which represents 40% of the US residential solar addressable market but has <1% penetration to date. The company utilizes a proven savings-based underwriting approach for customers who might not meet traditional FICO or income requirements. This was a co-investment alongside Gratitude’s sister organization, Builders Fund, which led the Series D. Since our investment, PosiGen has deployed 50MW across more than 6,000 systems, grown to 600 employees in 8 states, and gone on to raise ~$200M in additional equity from leading investment firms such as Magnetar and Activate.

Unlocking the Potential of Community and Mid-Market Solar

Meanwhile, we also continued to track the community and small commercial solar spaces due to their favorable impact profile: in addition to lowering energy costs and expanding access, these projects can make grids more resilient, create local jobs, build on existing structures, and enable community organizations to meet their climate goals in a visible way.

While community and mid-market solar have been growing over time, they represent a part of the market that has been chronically underinvested. The reasons for this are multifaceted, but one challenge has been procuring a part of the typical solar capital stack known as “tax equity” (funding provided by an investor who can benefit from federal tax credits). Tax equity investment historically had high transaction costs and was viewed as more attractive for projects that are larger in scale, exacerbating cost of capital barriers for smaller projects.

The Inflation Reduction Act’s provisions have opened up this mid-market in important ways. The investment tax credit, first enacted in 2006, was extended at 30% for qualifying projects through 2032. The law also made the tax credits “portable,” i.e., able to be transferred to an entity that can use them, reducing barriers to tax equity investment which is particularly impactful for this mid-market. Moreover, it established tax credit “bonuses” – additional credits for projects located in low-income and/or “energy” communities, for example. These tax credits can now collectively account for more than half of the cost of a solar project – significantly lowering the cost of capital for project development.

These favorable changes in community and mid-market solar inspired us to launch a new partnership with Plankton Energy, a solar developer with a track record in this space. Gratitude and Plankton are now working together to leverage our joint capabilities in solar development and financing, asset management, and impact to support the expansion of community and commercial solar projects in the northeastern United States and beyond.

Investing in Electrifying Everything

The flip side of creating a renewable-centric grid is of course ensuring that previously fossil-fuel-dependent industries utilize it, including by electrifying target sectors. The IRA and infrastructure laws were partly designed to accelerate adoption of grid-utilizing sectors, including through corporate and consumer tax benefits. We are seeing an increasing number of companies that are leveraging this policy moment and innovating to accelerate the adoption of and access to electric vehicles, heat pumps, and related domestic US manufacturing – all of which are growing in terms of market share.

In the EV space, for example, we recently invested in it’s electric, an innovative curbside EV charging solution for dense urban neighborhoods. It’s electric’s charger is a sleek design whereby drivers bring their own cord to eliminate curbside clutter and a significant challenge of shared chargers: broken cords. In addition, the charger draws electricity from adjacent buildings, which creates income for landlords. As does community solar, this investment aligns with our climate justice thesis, because a key objective is to extend the financial and health benefits of EVs to underserved communities. One of our portfolio funds Good Growth Capital has backed GoPowerEV, which is solving for EV charging within multifamily properties and has the potential to similarly unlock green solutions to new consumer segments.

All is not rosy in investing in renewables and climate. Interest rates, supply issues, and changing state policies, among other things, have kept things dynamic. Still, we are living in a time that Goldman Sachs Research has deemed “the most supportive regulatory environment in clean tech history.”3 We’re excited to see entrepreneurs and fund managers responding with new, economically compelling opportunities that can help the U.S get to its goal of having 100% carbon-pollution free electricity by 2035,4 and leveraging all the social, environmental, business, and customer benefits of a green grid.

 

Article by Rebekah Saul Butler, Managing Partner at Gratitude Railroad, an investor community-driven impact investment firm, where she serves as Co-CEO and jointly oversees all aspects of the growing business including investments, business strategy and development, and finance and operations. 

Prior to joining Gratitude, Rebekah was Co-Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer of The Grove Foundation, a 501(c)(3) philanthropic foundation, and Managing Director of Grove Action Fund, a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization. She led the transition of the foundation’s $150M portfolio to complete mission alignment and managed a programmatically aligned carveout comprising 21 fund and direct investments. Prior to her work with the Grove organizations, Rebekah was a management consultant at Deloitte Consulting. She started her career at The Guttmacher Institute in Washington, D.C., where she analyzed and advocated on reproductive health policy. Rebekah has held leadership roles across a wide range of organizations and initiatives, including currently, on the Board of the Sierra Club Foundation where she is Chair of the Investment Committee and serves on the Executive and Audit committees.  

She is also a Lecturer on Sustainable, Climate and Impact investing at the Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley. She earned a BA with distinction in Sociology and Spanish from Stanford University and an MBA and MPH from UC Berkeley. She holds the Certified Investment Management Analyst® certification, administered by the Investments and Wealth Institute and taught in conjunction with the Yale School of Management.

 

Footnotes:

1  https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/12/climate-tech-investment-falls-2023-pwc/

2  https://assets.bbhub.io/professional/sites/24/2024-BCSE-BNEF-Sustainable-Energy-in-America-Factbook.pdf

3  https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/the-us-is-poised-for-an-energy-revolution.html

4  https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2023-05/DOE%20-%20100%25%20Clean%20Electricity%20-%20Final.pdf

Energy & Climate, Featured Articles, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

Beyond 2025: Setting Credible Sustainability Goals for Long-Term Impact

By Beth Richmond, Jacob Park & Margot Brent, BSR

Key Points

  • The world has experienced profound changes since many companies established their sustainability commitments for 2025 and 2030; the COVID-19 pandemic, wars in Ukraine and Gaza, and increased volatility due to inflation and high-interest rates have significantly reshaped operating environments.
  • Intensifying climate impact, explosive growth in AI, the evolving regulatory landscape and increasingly polarized stakeholder demands are all influencing how companies consider and communicate their sustainability goals and targets.
  • In considering what comes next, companies should leverage a robust process that pairs strategic foresight and visionary thinking with concrete near-term targets and strong operational planning.
  • Clarity of purpose and robust stakeholder engagement are more important than ever in developing goals that will stand the test of time.

Sustainability goals are naturally rooted in long-term ambition. It is not uncommon for companies to set goals 5-10 years in advance or, in the case of climate goals, even longer. Given this long-time horizon, they are often pegged to major global frameworks, such as the Sustainable Development Goals or net zero goals for 2030, 2040 and 2050.

BSR logoBSR research on members indicated that roughly 35 percent of time-bound goals expire in 2025, and another 40 percent are pegged to 2030. As 2025 goals reach their expiration date and we evaluate progress toward those 2030 commitments, it’s time for many companies to reflect on what they’ve learned and start thinking about what’s next. It’s clear that much has changed since the last time companies undertook this exercise. As we lay out in more detail below, the 2020s have been disruptive, and goals set before 2020 need updating to reflect a new reality and fresh vision.

The key question is: How can companies seize this moment to develop a set of goals that are ambitious, credible, and flexible enough to be fit for the future?

What are the Key Trends and Disruptions Impacting Goals? 

Many of the goals set to expire were developed in or before 2020. A great deal has changed since then, as the world experienced the COVID-19 pandemic, wars in Ukraine and Gaza, all amidst a macroeconomic context of inflation and high interest rates. And we should prepare for still more turbulence and change to come. As we look ahead, we need to consider four key trends that will further reshape the operating context for business in the next few years.

Intensifying Climate Impacts Bring New Levels of Disruption

We have seen to operations and value chains, threatening people, infrastructure, and the availability of raw materials. In the World Economic Forum’s 2024 Global Risks Report, extreme weather topped the list of risks that leaders believe could present a material crisis on a global scale. With progress on emissions reductions still insufficient to meet the challenge of keeping global warming within a 1.5°C limit, stakeholders—including regulators—are strengthening their calls to action. As companies revisit their climate goals, our guidance is to plan the energy transition in line with science, gear up adaptation and nature efforts, and to put justice and equity at the center of our efforts.

Explosive Growth in AI Capabilities is Poised to Change How we Work

It may significantly accelerate progress in scientific research and resource efficiency, and it may also pose risks to privacy, human rights, and livelihoods. As companies review and refresh goals, it will be important to closely monitor and understand these different possibilities, as well as the nascent efforts to regulate this technology.

Growing Geopolitical Tensions and Regional Conflicts are Disrupting Supply Chains

Trade policy and regulations, human rights, and the energy transition are increasingly refracted through a geopolitical lens. Meanwhile, concerns are rising about the potential for new conflicts. As we enter a season of global elections, leadership changes could result in additional geopolitical volatility. Strategic foresight techniques like scenario planning can help companies chart more resilient pathways towards achieving supply chain, sourcing-related goals, and energy transition goals.

The Fast-changing Regulatory Environment is a Critical Consideration

While new requirements like mandatory disclosure and due diligence may sometimes feel like an onerous compliance exercise, new laws and regulation like the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directives are a game-changer for sustainable business. The transition from voluntary to mandatory action is raising the floor for corporate performance and disclosure on a range of sustainability topics, and as such can be a strong foundation for goal-setting efforts.

Of course, all these challenges are interconnected. As our understanding of these complex issues deepens and cross-cutting regulatory requirements proliferate, the connection between traditionally siloed sustainability topics is likely to become more prominent and pressing. These interdependencies and reinforcements will need to be reflected in goals that are cross-cutting and holistic. Responsibility for implementation will need to move beyond the historical E, S and G divide.

With All of this in Play, How Can Companies Best Navigate?

At BSR, we continue to believe that there are several elements that, when taken together, result in ambitious but credible goals: clear priorities, strong understanding of context, and focus on long-term impact.

Focus carefully – Companies need to undertake sustainability due diligence to understand where impacts lie across the full value chain, how the business is connected to the impacts, how they’re governed and managed, and what more they can do to address harms. A double materiality assessment can further help to identify and rigorously prioritize potential business risks and opportunities over the short-, medium-, and long-term. While all impacts, risks, and opportunities should be monitored and managed, when it comes to goal setting, the aim of these efforts should be to surface a handful of focus areas where the company can truly have the most significant impact.

It is also important to consider how actions on selected focus areas will align with a company’s mission and values. Achieving ambitious, long-term goals requires the management of a complex array of thorny challenges. When companies face headwinds like the “ESG backlash” in the US and economic uncertainty, goals that feel misaligned with the core business will start to feel arbitrary and non-essential. Selecting focus areas with goals that clearly connect to mission and values will help ensure commitments remain relevant over time.

Build an inclusive process – Companies are most likely to achieve goals with strong buy-in from stakeholders, which can either be secured or severely undermined in the goal development process. A smart stakeholder engagement strategy enables diversity of thought, opportunities for co-creation, a clear-eyed view of potential operational challenges, and insights into stakeholder perceptions. It is important that companies consult both internal and external stakeholders, and where possible, engage directly with affected stakeholders.

There are a range of ways to do this in practice. As a starting point, companies can review documentation of prior engagements. They can conduct dedicated interviews, focus groups, and surveys to collect input or feedback on draft goals. They can also integrate discussions into ongoing stakeholder engagement efforts like established stakeholder advisory councils. The right solution will look different for each organization based on its existing relationships, governance structures, and logistical considerations, but the inclusion of diverse stakeholder viewpoints should always be an important priority.

Leverage futures thinking – Goals reflect our assumptions and aspirations about the future. If you have not explicitly considered how the world is changing, then you risk creating goals that are well-suited for today but will be seriously outdated a couple of years from now.

Although it’s impossible to fully predict the future, strategic foresight offers us structured ways to think about the future and can help inform goals that are more robust, resilient, and ambitious.

Trends analysis can be used to anticipate how the world is likely to change and to identify the likely headwinds and tailwinds for a company’s sustainability efforts. Integrating a perspective on relevant trends such as those mentioned above should be considered a fundamental ingredient for a robust sustainability strategy and goals.

In conditions of high uncertainty, such as those surrounding political shifts, scenario analysis offers a tool to increase resilience by stress-testing strategies and goals against multiple different versions of the future.

Finally, futures techniques like Three Horizons can serve to articulate ambitious visions and goals that support the deep transformation that is needed.

Whether you are refreshing your goals or overhauling your overall vision and strategy, creating credible and ambitious goals requires a robust process that is both future-orientated and grounded in operational realities. We look forward to supporting businesses to do this as we look beyond 2025. Please feel free to connect with our Futures Lab and Sustainability Management teams to learn more.

 

Article by Beth Richmond, Director of Transformation at BSR; Jacob Park, Director of Transformation at BSR; and Margot Brent, Manager of Transformation at BSR.

 BSR® is a sustainable business network and consultancy focused on creating a world in which all people can thrive on a healthy planet. With offices in Asia, Europe, and North America, BSR provides its 300+ member companies with insight, advice, and collaborative initiatives to help them see a changing world more clearly, create long-term value, and scale impact. Global offices in Copenhagen, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, London, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Shanghai, Singapore, Tokyo, and Washington, D.C.

Energy & Climate, Featured Articles, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

From Honest to Just: How Coca-Cola’s Fumble with Honest Tea Turned into an Unexpected Gift

By Seth Goldman, Eat The Change and Just Ice Tea

Seth Goldman of Eat The Change and Just Ice TeaTwo years ago this month I was informed by senior leaders from The Coca-Cola Company (KO) that Honest Tea, the brand I launched out of my house in 1998, would be discontinued.

Despite the brand’s success as the world’s first organic and Fair Trade certified bottled tea brand, supply chain disruptions during the pandemic made Honest Tea a victim of Coke’s “Fewer, Bigger Bets” strategy.

But what felt like a huge setback turned out to be a gift, and an interesting lesson in the challenges big corporations have in scaling mission-driven brands.

Within ten days of hearing the news about Honest Tea’s demise, our sense of loss morphed into a determination that Honest Tea’s organic and Fair Trade values were too important – to our farmers (most of whom found out about Honest Tea’s termination from my LinkedIn post) and our customers, to be allowed to disappear. But the biggest piece of inspiration came via an email I received from one of our longtime tea suppliers:

I am just hearing the news and reading your note on LinkedIn. The story of Honest Tea is very connected to our own, our company, and the gardens and people with whom we work at origin, so the news is definitely a “gut punch,” for us as well. For my father and myself, while the financial consequences are material, the loss of confidence in Organic and Fair Trade agriculture that this decision is likely to engender in the wider community is very saddening and probably more consequential over the long term – especially in terms of lost motivation at origins. We have been so inspired to be part of the journey that you led, and want to try to continue the effort (and fight the suggestion that this was all a failed experiment).

After receiving that email, I didn’t need any more convincing! Of course, we also looked at the market and were convinced that there was an immediate opportunity to capture much of Honest Tea’s volume (which had grown to $75 million before I left) as well as expand beyond that size because the receptivity to Organic and Fair Trade had grown since 2019.  It was also clear that since the pandemic there had been no innovation in bottled iced tea – the shelves were filled with the usual suspects – Arizona, Snapple, Pure Leaf and Gold Peak, and no one was bringing anything fresh or exciting to the category.

We couldn’t buy back the Honest name because Coke was still building Honest Kids. So my HT-co-founder Barry Nalebuff and I brainstormed over a weekend and came up with a new name that would help communicate what our new brand would stand for. We came up with Just Ice Tea. My Eat The Change co-founder Chef Spike Mendelsohn started brewing recipes that were enhancements of Honest Tea’s greatest hits.

By September 6, 2022, less than 100 days after we heard the news about Honest Tea, we had sold our first bottle at a PLNT Burger restaurant in NYC. Today Just Ice Tea is the top-selling bottle tea brand in the natural channel (as tracked by SPINS). Our sales hit $16 million in the past 12 months, and we are just starting to sell into national foodservice, drug, mass and convenience chains.

Shakespeare wrote in All’s Well that Ends Well, “No legacy is so rich as honesty.” So, before I focus on the impact of Just Ice Tea, it feels appropriate to reflect on Honest Tea’s legacy:

  • Honest Kids, our lower sugar organic juice drink, is still flourishing as the top-selling organic kids juice drink. It is distributed nationally in more than 100,000 outlets, including McDonalds, Wendy’s, Subway, Chik-Fil-A, Arby’s – none of which come to mind when you think organic drink. So, our aspiration to democratize organic foods is being realized.
  • The caloric impact of Honest Kids is profound. The placement of the 35-calorie drink boxes at McDonald’s where they replaced an 80-calorie juice box (at the same price point) has contributed to removing more than one billion empty calories from the American diet.
  • Dozens of amazing entrepreneurs who got their start with Honest are now building the next wave of mission-driven brands. The branches of the Honest employee tree extend into many of today’s most cherished brands including Good Culture, Calicraft, Aldi, Super Coffee, Rishi, Timberland, Beyond Meat, Jeni’s, and Partake Foods.
  • Ripples in the mission-driven space continue. The success of Honest inspired thousands of entrepreneurs, investors and larger food companies to embrace the healthier, organic and Fair Trade approach to food. Our book, Mission in a Bottle: The Honest Guide to Doing Business Differently, which was a New York Timesbestseller, helped provide the playbook for tens of thousands of rising leaders.

Above: Cha de Magoma, the tea garden in Mozambique that is the exclusive tea supplier for Just Ice Tea canned line

Shortly after we launched Just Ice Tea, I took my co-founder Chef Spike Mendelsohn to a tea garden in Zambezia Province in Mozambique (pictured above). The landscape was breathtaking – green rolling hills, surrounded by fragrant eucalyptus trees, laced with waterfalls and streams flowing throughout. Roughly ten thousand people live throughout the tea fields. In addition to picking tea leaves, they grow their own crops for food and income.

Even with the higher-than-normal Fair Trade USA wages that Cha de Magoma pays the tea pickers, Zambezia Province is one of the poorest provinces in one of the poorest countries (186 out of 192) in the world. The average life expectancy is 54.6 years. Not only are cholera, malaria, and AIDS major threats but residents lack access to medical services to diagnose these illnesses. When we met with the Worker’s Council that decides how our Fair Trade premiums are spent, they requested we focus our donations on building a pathology clinic that can test, diagnose, and provide basic treatment for illnesses. Without access to this kind of resource, villagers need to travel 90 minutes, which is especially challenging since they lack access to cars. This year we will be contributing and raising funds for the medical equipment needed to launch this facility.

When we launched Just Ice Tea, we wanted to honor and celebrate what Honest Tea stood for, but promised ourselves we wouldn’t be operating with an old playbook. The launch of our new canned line is the latest example of our commitment to think more broadly and boldly about where Just Ice Tea can go. The cans should help support our efforts to democratize organics by making more sustainable and healthier foods/drinks available to more people because of their lower price point. 

The whole Honest-to-Just Ice Tea experience has confirmed for me that Karma is real – positive intentions and actions count. Because we tried to do the right things at HT, every part of the supply chain was eager to work with us again – farmers, retailers, distributors, suppliers and co-packers, not to mention investors and consumers.

Honest Tea’s termination created a big hole in the marketplace and we have been fortunate to be able to fill a lot of it. Now it’s up to us to see if we can take Just Ice Tea beyond where Honest went and realize the full promise of the brand and the values it represents.

NOTE: Listen to Cliff’s GreenMoney interview with Seth Goldman at the 30th SRI Conference in 2019 – reflecting on what it takes to keep a social mission at the center of a brand.

 

Article by Seth Goldman, co-founder of Eat the Change®, a planet-friendly snack and drink company that recently launched Just Ice Tea, a line of organic bottled tea to go along with the company’s Cosmic carrot snacks. Seth is also co-founder of PLNT Burger, Honest Tea, and Chair of the board of Beyond Meat. He has been widely recognized for his entrepreneurial success and impact, including the Washington DC Business Hall of Fame, Partnership for Healthier America’s CEO of the Year, Organic Trade Association’s Organic Social Impact recipient, and Earthday.org Climate Visionary of the year.

Featured Articles, Food & Farming, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

How the Future of Water will Impact Businesses and Communities

By Doug Pushard, KuelWater and HarvestH2O

Above – A water mechanical room, fully monitored with online controls, in a Santa Fe, NM home which integrates city water, gray water and rainwater into a system that distributes water inside and outside of the house. The system was designed by Doug Pushard of HarvestH20 and installed by 1st Choice Plumbing. The Libert’s Home Project won the WERS Award in 2023 for the Lowest Residence Water Use in the country.
Doug Pushard Kuel WaterWater is the essence of life, and yet it is almost universally taken for granted. This is at a time when we are seeing unprecedented and dire water issues crop up around the world. Here is a quick sampling of some of the headlines from this just this year… and it is only April:

Mexico City may be months away from running out of water

In winter 2021, more than 150,000 people living in Jackson, Miss., were left without running water and it has gotten worse

Agriculture built these High Plains towns in Colorado, now it might run them dry

Today, water is readily available to most of us, but not all. Per the United Nations, five (5) billion people, or 2/3 of the world’s population, will face water shortages by 2050. This is not just somewhere else in the world; it is also coming to the USA.

Most surprising is that the technology has existed to solve our most pressuring water problems for years, but impediments abound to prevent solutions from being implemented.

Water is managed as a resource (i.e., drinking water) and a waste product (i.e., stormwater). Water is managed as both a business and as a common good. Water is segregated into different operating silos to optimize differing business models. Yet, at the same time, an abundance of water in one operating unit is not considered a resource for another. Population growth and new housing development are two major issues underlying the need to find more water, yet water is not linked to land use management.

Balancing all these issues while ensuring safe, readily available drinking water, attracting and managing employees in today’s complex work environment, keeping both the sewage smell away from population centers and flood waters at bay, is enough to overwhelm most water professionals.

Yet, cracks in the dam are beginning to appear that will dramatically change how we view water.

Business and the Importance of Water

  • General Mills has recognized the importance of water to its businesses and includes the risks to this critical business component as a strategic component. They have committed to advancing water stewardship plans for their most material and at-risk watersheds in their global value chain. They are also exploring, through research and farmer pilots, regenerative agriculture as a means to improve water quality and quantity impact.
  • The Google water stewardship strategy is centered around assessing and addressing water-related risks to their business and the opportunities we have to not just mitigate those risks, but also create solutions that can be scaled beyond our own corporate footprint and to partner with others to address this shared challenge. Their stated goal is to replenish 120% of the freshwater volume they consume, on average, across their offices and data centers, and help restore and improve the quality of water and health of ecosystems in the communities where they operate.
  • More and more businesses now have an executive in charge of Sustainability, and water is managed as critical to the core business.

New Views on Water

Efforts like One Water, National Blue Ribbon Commission, the International Association of Plumbing & Mechanical Officials’ (IAPMO) Water Demand Calculator, and water ratings are pushing new views on water:

  • The US Water Alliance’s “One Water” approach manages all water—whether from the tap, a stream, a storm, an aquifer, or a sewer—in a collaborative, integrated, inclusive, and holistic manner. One Water can change and regenerate how we live, our opportunities, our environment, and our society. This initiative pushes for a new way of viewing and managing water from a utility perspective.
  • The National Blue Ribbon Commission advances best management practices to support onsite, non-potable water systems within individual buildings or at the local scale. They assist code officials in updating building codes to enable new uses for existing and previously untapped water sources.
  • Pipe sizing curves for sizing the pipes installed in every US building have not been updated since the 1940s! Every new building using these antiquated curves is putting in tremendously oversized pipes and costing everyone money. IAPMO has released a Water Demand Calculatorthat accurately sizes the required pipes and is working with permitting agencies to ensure these new pipe calculations are accepted by permitting agencies.
  • A water rating is a performance-based methodology that qualifies and, in some cases, incentives, water efficiency. Applicable for single-family and multifamily residential properties, water ratings can project future water usage while preserving design and product choice freedom. Land use departments could use a water rating, such as the Water Efficiency Rating Score (WERS), to help communities enable sustainable growth while ensuring adequate water supplied for existing residents.
Doug Pushard Day - Doug receiving Santa Fe Mayor's 2023 Proclamation Award
Doug Pushard receiving an award from the Mayor of Santa Fe – A Proclamation calling ‘June 23, 2023- Doug Pushard Day’ for all of his work on water for the City of Santa Fe. (From left to right – Mike Collignon, Green Builder Coalition and co-founder of NGWS; Christine Chavez, Water Conservation Dept. for the City of Santa Fe; Doug Pushard, KuelWater and HarvestH2O and co-founder of NGWS; Glenn Schiffbauer, Green Chamber of Commerce and co-founder of NGWS; and Alan Webber, Mayor of the City of Santa Fe.

New Water Technology Companies

New water technology companies are beginning to push into areas that will cause code officials to become very uncomfortable but will save water and eventually find a way into the market.

  • Orbital graywater recycling shower recycles shower water while taking a shower. This type of device will reduce potable shower water use by 70-80% and is not allowed by current plumbing codes in the United States. Products like these are being installed in Europe today and will eventually find a way into the US.
  • Tiny homes come equipped with graywater systems, which includes kitchen water in the waste stream. Graywater codes exclude kitchen waste from graywater discharge in almost all state and national plumbing codes, yet thousands of these new units are being sold and installed across the country.
  • Treating blackwater to drinking water quality is a known science. Other countries have been doing this for over a decade. Yet only California now has standards to enable water utilities to begin the years-long process of bringing this ‘new’ source of drinking water online.
  • Smart Water meters, both whole house and landscape meters, are becoming widely available. These meters increase homeowners’ awareness of water and directly attack the 10%+ water leakage reported in end-user water usage studies. This will give homeowners newer, more accurate meters than the utilities have installed. The data from products like these will drive increased awareness, because now awareness is down to the fixture level. That was impossible just 10 years ago.
  • Google is partnering with the state of New Mexico using satellite imagery to locate leaking water pipes. New Mexico loses between 40-70% of treated drinking water in some older systems due to breaks and leaks. This new partnership and technology will drive future water savings in New Mexico and hopefully in other states in the near future.

As the above illustrates, technology, policies, and perceptions are changing, water source uses are changing, and weather patterns are changing. All things water are beginning to change and will drive how we view and manage water.

Communities and Water Management

Communities will need to rethink how they manage water. No longer as a silo (i.e., a potable water company, a sewer company, a land use and planning department, etc.), but instead as one collective effort. Water conservation will no longer be a revenue-reducing effort, but a water-producing department. Stormwater and blackwater will be considered potable water sources, not waste streams. Onsite residential reuse (i.e., rainwater, graywater, and/or blackwater) will become commonplace and part of a community’s sustainable growth plan. Integrating management of all water resources and future water demand management through land use codes.

The Next Generation Water Summit (NGWS), held annually in Santa Fe, NM, brings together the building and development community, water reuse professionals and water policymakers in a collaborative setting to share and assist in pushing these efforts forward. Workshops, presentations, tours, and networking have been part of the NGWS since its inception almost ten years ago. The theme of the 2024 Next Generation Water Summit is: Solutions for a Changing World. Join us for this event on June 20th and 21st, live or virtually. Many of the topics in this article will be featured at this year’s NGWS. Join us in creating the water future we all need. 

 

Article by Doug Pushard, the founder of KuelWater. He also founded  HarvestH2o.com over 20 years ago as a personal expression of his interest in the subject of rainwater catchment, water reuse and water conservation. Doug has been published and featured in several magazines, including: ARCSA Newsletter, BUILDERnews, New York Times, High Country News, Back Home, EcoStructure, Green Fire Times, Home Power, Lowe’s Online, OnTap, Plenty, Santa Fe Real Estate Magazine, Santa Fean Magazine, Smart HomeOwner, SUN Monthly, Sustainable Santa Fe, Sustainable Taos, Timber Home Living, Taos News, Turf Magazine, Water Today, Fox News, Green Patriot Radio and others. Additionally, Doug has presented on rainwater, water reuse and water conservation at conferences around the United States.

Doug is an active participant on several code committees, works with communities to update the land use and water codes, teaches water courses at Santa Fe Community College and Red Rock Community College, is a technical advisor to the Water Efficiency Rate Score development team (WERS), a performance-based home and multi-family water efficiency measurement system, a WERS certified instructor, a Qualified Water Efficient Landscape (QWEL) irrigation and graywater certified instructor, a life-time member of American Rainwater Catchment System Association, and is a co-founder of the Next Generation Water Summit.

Energy & Climate, Featured Articles, Food & Farming, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

The Economic and Water Impacts of the EPA’s “Slaughterhouse” Rule

By Marc Yaggi, Waterkeeper Alliance

Pictured is reported to be the largest hog slaughterhouse in the world. It is located in Tar Heel, North Carolina, operates under Smithfield Foods, Inc., and is wholly owned by the WH Group. Approximately 35,000 hogs are slaughtered there each day and waste is discharged into the Cape Fear River. Photo credit: Rick Dove, Waterkeeper Alliance

Marc Yaggi, Waterkeeper AllianceThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has a decision to make. Right now the agency is considering new water pollution standards for slaughterhouses and rendering facilities in response to lawsuits from environmental organizations. These standards are urgently needed to correct a long-standing regulatory failure to control one of the nation’s largest industrial sources of nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. Despite its stated mission to safeguard human health and the environment, EPA’s current regulations do not address phosphorus discharges, and the agency has neglected to update water pollution standards for other harmful pollutants from this industry for nearly twenty years, as required by the Clean Water Act.

This is no accident. Large industrial animal agriculture companies have invested millions of dollars in lobbying to ensure the status quo, which in turn, protects their growing profits. This includes U.S. domestic sales, which were estimated at $267 billion in 2021, and a projected goldmine of global industrial meat production associated with expansions of beef, pork, and chicken exports since 2010. It is reported that the four largest meat processing conglomerates operating in the U.S., which control approximately 55 percent to 85 percent of the market for pork, beef, and poultry, have collectively increased their gross profits by 120 percent and net income by 500 percent since 2019.

As global meat production continues to rise to meet a projected doubling of meat-based protein consumption by 2050, corporate owners of these large facilities are not incentivized to modernize their systems, treat their waste, and control their discharges that typically contains nitrogen and phosphorus, as well as blood, fat, oil and grease, fecal bacteria, disease-causing pathogens, detergents, and heavy metals. Without regulatory scrutiny and guardrails, “Big Agriculture” will persist in operating without consequences, reaping all the profits while communities drown in its toxic brew of pollution.

Slaughterhouses that discharge pollution directly into US waterways - Waterkeeper Alliance

According to EPA’s data, there are 5,055 slaughterhouses and rendering facilities in the U.S. and 3,879 of those facilities are discharging approximately 112 million pounds of nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus into 2,736 water bodies every year. These massive, untreated discharges are directly linked to significant impacts like water contamination and algal blooms, which can render water unsafe for drinking, unfit for recreation, and uninhabitable for aquatic life. Communities exposed to nitrogen compounds in drinking water are linked to higher incidences of colorectal cancer, thyroid disease, birth defects, and —in infants under six months of age— “blue baby syndrome,” a potentially fatal condition.

While industry takes advantage of the economic benefits of their polluting business practices, they simultaneously jeopardize the future of rural America’s economic development in multiple ways. Local economies suffer from the devastating consequences of nutrient-fueled algal blooms, which deplete oxygen in water and result in fish kills and “dead zones” in iconic water bodies like the Chesapeake Bay and the Gulf of Mexico. Hazardous pollution from large slaughterhouses disproportionately impacts local drinking water sources, fisheries, recreation, and tourism in rural areas, while also harming community health and finances.

Contaminated water and land represent significant economic liabilities, with pollution from large slaughterhouses driving down property values for residences and businesses while escalating public health risks and associated costs. Further, the dominance of large processing facilities over smaller, less polluting plants negatively affects small and family-owned farms that rely on these independent local facilities for processing.

The pollution originating from slaughterhouses and rendering facilities also compounds environmental injustice, disproportionately affecting low-income communities and communities of color. EPA data reveals that 74% of slaughterhouses directly discharging pollution into rivers and streams are located within one mile of under-resourced and low-income communities, as well as communities of color. Despite this acknowledgment, the agency has taken minimal action to shield these vulnerable communities from the unequal burdens imposed by corporate interests. Instead of perpetuating these injustices, EPA has an opportunity to right this wrong through proposed new water pollution control standards for larger, more polluting slaughterhouses and rendering plants while avoiding significant impacts and costs to small firms and facilities.

Slaughterhouses that discharge indirectly into waterways - Waterkeeper Alliance

Unfortunately, the agency’s current preferred rulemaking option – Option 1 – is the weakest option and would still allow thousands of larger slaughterhouses and rendering plants to continue their business-as-usual practices that create local environmental and economic harm. At a minimum, EPA must adopt the pollution standards set forth in the proposed rule Option 3, which would include nitrogen, phosphorus, and conventional pollutant limits on 133 facilities that directly discharge pollutants into waterways and 1,485 facilities that discharge to municipal wastewater treatment plants. EPA estimates that Option 3 will cut the total amount of nitrogen pollution from the industry by 83 percent (or 76 million pounds annually) and phosphorus pollution by 94 percent (or 20 million pounds) with tangible public health, environmental, and economic benefits for communities and local businesses.

It is crucial for EPA to address pollution stemming from larger slaughterhouses and rendering facilities, including those indirectly discharging waste to municipal wastewater treatment plants. These treatment plants are frequently overstressed, underfinanced, and ill-equipped to handle industrial waste. Continuing this practice allows the industry’s waste and harmful pollutants to pass through the system and discharge into waterways, likely contributing to 73 percent of treatment plants evaluated by EPA violating their Clean Water Act permit limits, and forcing the clean-up costs onto the public. EPA has also determined that interference from discharges to municipal wastewater treatment plants is costly in terms of worker safety, physical plant integrity, effectiveness of operation, and liability for permit violations.

It is important to note that there is effective technology that is readily available and widely used for wastewater treatment globally, which slaughterhouses and rendering plants can use to comply with the pollution standards in EPA’s proposed rule. Under Option 3, industry compliance with the pollution standards is also economically achievable. For instance, EPA projects that 99.1 percent of discharging facilities would incur expenses amounting to less than one percent of their revenues to comply with Option 3 limits for nitrogen and phosphorus. By modernizing major corporate processors, stringent water pollution standards would stimulate investments in American infrastructure and foster employment opportunities in rural areas, including an estimated net increase of 1,603 local jobs for operating and maintaining the industry’s upgraded treatment technology.

It is evident, both environmentally and economically, that EPA must correct its decades-long inaction by firmly rejecting industry influence and committing to a modernized, robust regulatory framework that supports an investment in the health and sustainability of rural communities, life-supporting waterways, and the economy. Our communities deserve nothing less than the highest level of clean water protections as mandated by law.

 

Article by Marc Yaggi is Chief Executive Officer of Waterkeeper Alliance, a U.S.-based, global water advocacy organization. Before joining Waterkeeper Alliance, Marc was a Senior Attorney and Watershed Program Director for Riverkeeper, Inc. and previously served as a Staff Attorney with the Environmental Law Institute in Washington, D.C. He has a degree in Administration of Justice from The Pennsylvania State University and a J.D. and an LL.M in Environmental Law from the Pace University School of Law.

Energy & Climate, Featured Articles, Food & Farming, Sustainable Business

Investing in the Future of Water and Sanitation

By Elan Emanuel, WaterEquity

Photo courtesy of WaterEquity/water.org

Elan Emanuel WaterEquityAccess to safe water and sanitation is a fundamental human right under binding international law. Yet today, a global water crisis still persists. 2.2 billion people—or 1 in 4—still lack access to safe water and 3.5 billion people—or 2 in 5—lack access to safely managed sanitation. While gains have been made over several decades, the effects of climate change have become a large and looming factor, halting progress made. Though the role of the public sector remains paramount in addressing the crisis, private impact investment has recently also emerged as a powerful tool.

Investing in Household Water and Sanitation Solutions

Impact investing focuses on generating positive social and environmental impact while seeking financial returns. In the realm of water and sanitation, investment plays a pivotal role in supporting innovative solutions, especially at the household level. Among low-income consumers, at least 600 million people could access water and sanitation products, services, and upgrades if financing was available, equating to what WaterEquity estimates as $35 billion of market demand over the next decade.

WaterEquity has approached this market opportunity through an investment strategy focused on providing debt capital to financial institutions in emerging markets to expand water and sanitation lending. These financial institutions use this capital to grow their water and sanitation microloan portfolios, as well as to on-lend to local enterprises delivering water and sanitation innovations, products, and services. Since our start in 2016, WaterEquity has deployed more than $360 million in capital to this strategy across four private investment funds, reaching more than 5 million people with increased access to safe water and sanitation.

Over 93 percent of the low-income end-clients taking out these microloans are women. This is no accident, as the funds have specifically targeted women beneficiaries by integrating gender into our investment and decision-making processes. And the microloans are repaid at the average rate of 97-99% within 12-24 months. Ensuring equitable access to safe water and sanitation cannot be accomplished without giving women the power and the capital to solve for their futures.

Investing in Climate-Resilient Infrastructure

Installation of water pipes, courtesy water
Photo courtesy of WaterEquity/water.org

Financing the “last mile” of water and sanitation access at the household level will only take us so far in reaching the billions affected. There is also a tremendous need and market opportunity for sustained investment in potable and wastewater infrastructure seeking to increase access to water and sanitation services, improve water quality, and mitigate the impacts of water scarcity. Moreover, with traditional infrastructure often vulnerable to damage from extreme weather events, investment in resilient systems is essential for ensuring sustainable access to water and sanitation services.

By investing in climate-resilient infrastructure, WaterEquity’s Water & Climate Resilience Fund aims to reach 15 million people with water and sanitation access, and indirectly benefit millions more through improvements in water quality and scarcity. Investments include government tendered projects such as the construction of decentralized water treatment plants, the upgrading of existing infrastructure to withstand extreme weather events, and the implementation of smart water management systems. The Fund will also invest directly in growth companies that are developing and deploying innovative technology and services within the sector. These projects and companies enhance the reliability and efficiency of water and sanitation systems at scale, while also contributing to the overall climate resilience of underserved communities.

Conclusion

Impact investing has the potential to transform the landscape of water and sanitation, addressing the complex challenges posed by the water crisis, climate change, and gender disparities. By supporting innovative household solutions and investing in climate-resilient infrastructure, impact investors can contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals and improve the well-being of communities around the world, aligning values with the potential for financial returns. This holistic approach not only addresses immediate water and sanitation challenges but also builds resilient communities capable of withstanding the impacts of a changing climate. Through strategic and socially responsible investments, we can ensure a future where safe water and sanitation are accessible to all.

water.org photo of woman gathering safe drinking water from pump
Photo courtesy of WaterEquity/water.org

 

Article by Elan Emanuel, the Chief Investor Relations Officer at WaterEquity. Elan is responsible for mobilizing investments and partnerships with a broad portfolio of investors to accelerate WaterEquity’s impact addressing the global water and sanitation crisis. He brings 15+ years of experience in developing public-private partnerships to this role. WaterEquity emerged out of Water.org and was cofounded by actor Matt Damon and Gary White.

 Prior to WaterEquity, Elan led Fair Trade USA’s global cocoa program, where he established and directed strategic partnerships with large multi-national corporations, NGOs, and agricultural cooperatives. Additionally, Elan has extensive experience in the legal sector, domestically for Hanson Bridgett LLC, and internationally for the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the Sierra Leone Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Elan holds a Bachelor of Arts in History from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and a Juris Doctor from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law.

Energy & Climate, Featured Articles, Food & Farming, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

Signup to receive GreenMoney's monthly eJournal

Privacy Policy
Copyright © GreenMoney Journal 2024

Website design & development by BrandNature

Global Events Calendar

View All Events

september

10sepAll Day11Sustainability LIVE Conference - London

10sepAll Day12Innovate4Climate – Berlin

11sepAll Day12Responsible Investor Canada 2024 – Toronto

X